| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 58.11 |
| Liaison | R. Johnston |
| Submission Date | March 10, 2014 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Missouri, Kansas City
OP-12: Electronics Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.98 / 1.00 |
R. Kaye
Johnston Sustainability Coordinator Campus Facilities |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase computers and/or other electronic products that are EPEAT registered or meet similar multi-criteria sustainability standards for electronic products?:
Yes
None
A copy of the electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines:
None
The electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines :
Best Practices: Look for the most energy efficient model: The US EPA Energy Star program rates and certifies hundreds of energy efficient products. By choosing Energy Star, you are helping prevent global warming and promote cleaner air without sacrificing the product quality and performance you expect.
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed:
UMKC uses Opitplex and Latitudes that are on the MU standards list are EPEAT GOLD under the current Dell standards rating.
http://ww2.epeat.net/Companies.aspx
None
Does the institution wish to pursue to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on EPEAT registered electronics)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on EPEAT registered desktop and laptop computers, displays, thin clients, televisions, and imaging equipment::
| Expenditure Per Level | |
| EPEAT Bronze | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| EPEAT Silver | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| EPEAT Gold | 1,304,966 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on desktop and laptop computers, displays, thin clients, televisions, and imaging equipment:
1,346,146
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the institution's electronics purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.