Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 60.64
Liaison Amanda Kohn
Submission Date Feb. 13, 2024

STARS v2.2

University of Minnesota, Crookston
OP-16: Commute Modal Split

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.91 / 5.00
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
1,500

Full-time equivalent of employees:
226

Part 1. Student commute modal split

Has the institution gathered data about student commuting behavior?:
Yes

Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
67

A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
Assumptions can be made based on address data and students living on campus, but no formal commute inventory has been completed. The percentage above only accounts for the 361 students living on campus and their primary mode for transportation would be walking and the 651 students that are exclusively enrolled in distance education and would not be commuting to campus.

Part 2. Employee commute modal split

Has the institution gathered data about employee commuting behavior?:
No

Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
0

A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
Assumptions can be made based on address data and students living on campus, but no formal commute inventory has been completed.

Optional Fields 

Percentage of students and employees that use the following as their primary mode of transportation:
Percentage of students (0-100) Percentage of employees (0-100)
Single-occupancy vehicle --- ---
Zero-emissions vehicle --- ---
Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode --- ---
Vanpool or carpool --- ---
Public transport or campus shuttle --- ---
Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped --- ---
Distance education / telecommute --- ---

Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.