Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 70.07
Liaison Andrew Horning
Submission Date June 30, 2015
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

University of Michigan
IN-4: Innovation 4

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Donald Scavia
Director
Graham Environmental Sustainability Institute
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Title or keywords related to the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
U-M Sustainable Labs Program Shut the Sash and Ultra Low Freezer Energy Conservation campaigns.

A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:

The Sustainability Laboratory recognition program was designed by the Office of Campus Sustainability (OCS) to promote sustainable operations in teaching and research labs across our campus. Benefits from this program include but not limited to: The introduction to Green chemistry practices that our students and industry are expecting, Reduced consumption of energy and utilities, Reduction in use and generation of hazardous materials, Increase in use and recycling, Improved safety for lab students, faculty and staff The Sustainable Labs Program is an ongoing initiative, and for the purpose of this Innovation Credit we would like to focus on two new programs, the Shut the Sash campaign and the Ultra-Low Freezer Energy Conservation campaign. To reduce energy consumption and costs in all university laboratories, the Office of Campus Sustainability has launched the Shut the Sash awareness campaign. "Shut the Sash" reminds lab users to close the transparent barrier on chemical fume hoods when not in use to avoid unnecessary energy consumption. As part of the campaign, OCS is working with facility managers, safety coordinators, lab directors and students to place large, magnetic signs with reminders to close the sash on each unit. The goal is to achieve an overall energy reduction of 15 percent, equating to an avoidance of $2 million in energy costs and 9,531 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions. Two models of fume hoods are used in campus laboratories: Constant Air Volume (CAV) and Variable Air Volume (VAV). While both models will display the awareness signage, OCS representatives anticipate the VAV model's design will offer the greatest energy conservation — up to 50 percent — when the sash is closed because the unit's fan speed and volume of air being exhausted also is reduced. Ultra Low Temperature (ULT) freezers are common in life sciences, biochemistry and biology laboratories. They are not only expensive to procure, but also have significant operating costs and can account for 5% or more of a laboratory’s electricity use. Samples like DNA, RNA, antigens, bacteria, viruses, cell liners and more are being stored in these freezers. Today most ULT freezers operate between -80 and -86 C. Energy costs to run a ULT freezer vary from $750 to $1000/year and there are more than 1000 ULT freezers on our campus. Historically, the first ULT freezers operated at -60 C. 15 to 20 years ago most ULT freezers were running at -70 C and were referred to as ‘minus seventies. It is only recently that the modern -80 ULT freezers have become the industry norm. With energy conservation in mind, many higher education institutions are now looking at the option of raising the temperature of ULT freezers by 10 C without compromising the quality of research. Raising the temperature by 10 C has shown to save 10 to 15% of a freezer’s electricity costs and possibly up to 30% for some older freezer models. Studies have shown that DNA samples are stable with little or no denaturing when stored at temperatures as high as -20 C over 24 months. In a related study (Miller et. al.) have demonstrated that DNA, RNA, antigens and viruses are stable for twenty years at -70 C. Studies conducted at Wiley lab, University of Colorado also support that the above materials including competent cells are stable at -70 C for longer periods. Benefits of raising the temperature on ULT freezers to -70 C include: Up to 30% on energy savings Longer compressor life Less heat is generated in the laboratory.


A brief description of any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation (if not reported above):
---

A letter of affirmation from an individual with relevant expertise:
Which of the following STARS subcategories does the innovation most closely relate to? (Select all that apply up to a maximum of five):
Yes or No
Curriculum ---
Research Yes
Campus Engagement Yes
Public Engagement ---
Air & Climate Yes
Buildings ---
Dining Services ---
Energy Yes
Grounds ---
Purchasing ---
Transportation ---
Waste ---
Water ---
Coordination, Planning & Governance ---
Diversity & Affordability ---
Health, Wellbeing & Work ---
Investment ---

Other topic(s) that the innovation relates to that are not listed above:
---

The website URL where information about the innovation is available:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.