Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 48.58 |
Liaison | Janna Cohen-Rosenthal |
Submission Date | July 3, 2023 |
University of Massachusetts Boston
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.50 / 3.00 |
Dennis
Swinford Director of Campus Planning & Sustainability Office of Campus Planning and Sustainability |
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
Source:https://www.umassp.edu/sites/default/files/board-policies/T16-055-Sustainability%20Policy_rf012021.pdf
In addition, The University of Massachusetts system has a general purchasing policy that sets the framework for the operation of each campus. Section 2 of this policy states:
The University’s commitment to the principles of Affirmative Action shall be applied to purchasing with the objective of: (i) achieving and fostering greater participation in University procurement activity by minority-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses, women-owned small businesses, HUBZone,
small business, Veteran-owned small business, and service-disabled Veteran-owned small business enterprises, and (ii) encouraging socially or economically disadvantaged business owners to respond to invitations to bid on University business.
Source: https://www.umassp.edu/sites/default/files/board-policies/T92-031%20Procurement%20Policy%20and%20Administrative%20Standards%20-%20FINAL%2004112022.pdf
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
Consumable office products
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
Furniture and furnishings
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
Food service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
Garments and linens
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
Professional service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
Transportation and fuels
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
With the release of the Fuel Efficiency Standard for the State Fleet (FES), Massachusetts state agencies are now required to meet average fuel efficiency minimums for all new vehicle acquisitions and purchase a minimum percentage of hybrid, alternative fuel, or electric vehicles each year. Source: https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2016/10/tq/fuelefficiencystandard-final.pdf
UMB aims to reduce vehicle fuel consumption of the University vehicle fleet by promoting the use of public transportation, reducing the number of single occupancy vehicles, and increasing the use of other alternative fuel transportation for faculty, staff, and students. The University Master Plan includes transportation goals to maximize multimodal campus access and circulation while minimizing the negative impacts of vehicular traffic in and around the campus.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.