Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 48.58 |
Liaison | Janna Cohen-Rosenthal |
Submission Date | July 3, 2023 |
University of Massachusetts Boston
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.35 / 3.00 |
Janna
Cohen-Rosenthal Sustainability & Resiliency Planner Office of Campus Planning and Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
The SIMAP tool was used to conduct a market-based inventory. Energy data was recorded by the UMass System's energy consultants, CES. The University tracks vehicle fuel use.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 7,009.52 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 143.32 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
7,152.84
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 10,788.98 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
10,788.98
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | No | --- |
Commuting | No | --- |
Purchased goods and services | No | --- |
Capital goods | No | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | Yes | 3,432 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | No | --- |
Other sources | No | --- |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
3,432
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
Using the SIMAP tool, it calculated the FERA and T&D Losses.
We did not include commuting & business travel but hope to do so in the future and normalize to the baseline.
We did not include commuting & business travel but hope to do so in the future and normalize to the baseline.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
No
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | --- |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | --- |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | --- |
Particulate matter (PM) | --- |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | --- |
Area sources | --- |
Mobile sources | --- |
Commuting | --- |
Off-site electricity production | --- |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
---
Optional Fields
10,477.87
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Updated emissions reports will be posted to the SIMAP & Second Nature public page:https://unhsimap.org/public/emissions and at the Sustainability website: https://www.umb.edu/campus-planning/sustainability/.
Leading By Example Program (LBE)
UMass Boston reports annually to LBE for Scope 1 + 2 data. They use a different emissions factor than SIMAP. For STARS, we wanted to use the tools and protocols recommended best for higher ed. comparisons. Data reported using custom factors on the LBE website in other reports may be slightly different.
*Scope 3*
In the future, we will expand our current scope 3 reporting to include commuting & business travel as per climate commitments. However, due to COVID changes we want to develop a better way to normalize data from the commuter surveys in 2021 to 2022 and beyond. Business travel was also likely impacted.
*Renewables*
Renewable energy sources currently reported include the Solar Plus storage project hosted by UMass Boston on the Parking Garage and University Hall. The energy generated by these projects is purchased through a PPA with Enel who owns the system. The associated SRECs are sold by ENEL. While our reporting shows "sold" RECS, this is not by UMass Boston but by the third-party owner.
The Wheatley solar project is not operational as the quad project is under construction.
Leading By Example Program (LBE)
UMass Boston reports annually to LBE for Scope 1 + 2 data. They use a different emissions factor than SIMAP. For STARS, we wanted to use the tools and protocols recommended best for higher ed. comparisons. Data reported using custom factors on the LBE website in other reports may be slightly different.
*Scope 3*
In the future, we will expand our current scope 3 reporting to include commuting & business travel as per climate commitments. However, due to COVID changes we want to develop a better way to normalize data from the commuter surveys in 2021 to 2022 and beyond. Business travel was also likely impacted.
*Renewables*
Renewable energy sources currently reported include the Solar Plus storage project hosted by UMass Boston on the Parking Garage and University Hall. The energy generated by these projects is purchased through a PPA with Enel who owns the system. The associated SRECs are sold by ENEL. While our reporting shows "sold" RECS, this is not by UMass Boston but by the third-party owner.
The Wheatley solar project is not operational as the quad project is under construction.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.