Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 75.77
Liaison Nathanael Schildbach
Submission Date March 2, 2018
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

University of Massachusetts Amherst
OP-16: Student Commute Modal Split

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.42 / 2.00 Robert Hendry
Commuter Options Coordinator
Parking Services
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Total percentage of students (graduate and undergraduate) that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary means of transportation:
71

A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:

Data:
Parking Services uses questionnaires (most recent from 2017) to report data on non-residential (commuting students and employees) and reports this data to the MA DEP annually. There is no breakdown of commuter students vs employees from 2017 since the state doesn’t require a breakdown so we are using the same numbers for both students and employees for commuters.

Methodology for student commute modal split:
13,594 students live on campus and 100% of them use a sustainable means of commuting to and from campus. Total enrollment is 28,991. This leaves 15,397 students commuting which Parking Services reported as 47% sustainable commuting.

Therefore: (13,594x1.00)+(15,397x.47)=20,830.59 out of 28,991 total students enrolled are sustainable commuting = 71%


The percentage of students that use each of the following modes as their primary means of transportation to get to and from campus::
Percentage (0-100)
Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) 53
Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means 12
Vanpool or carpool 7
Take a campus shuttle or public transportation 28
Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped 0

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.