Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 74.20 |
Liaison | Juanita Van Norman |
Submission Date | Aug. 5, 2022 |
University of Manitoba
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.52 / 3.00 |
Mike
Ferley Mechanical Engineer Physical Plant |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
The GHG emissions inventory report was created using annual utility consumptions, Canada - National Inventory Report (NIR) methodology and emissions factors, and the National Pollutant Release Inventory – Canada (NPRI) calculator. The report was created to establish a baseline and build a reporting mechanism for the University. Consumption data was provided by the Purchasing and Physical Plant departments. FY2019/20 data was used because it represented full occupancy and pre-pandemic operating conditions.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
Yes
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
The inventory was validated (i) internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and (ii) by an external third-party consultant:
(i) Utility consumption and meter accuracy are independently validated by the external utility providers. Internal accounting personnel in Purchasing and Physical Plant departments validate billing accuracy to help ensure all consumptions are tracked, and bills paid. Applicable NIR emissions factors were used, and all factor values are included. Office of Sustainability staff and the University Engineer review reporting responses and data independently to help catch inconsistencies and/or errors.
(ii) External third-party validation was conducted by Sustainability Solutions Group (SSG) as part of the attached UM Climate Action Plan, draft submitted for UM Board of Governors approval Spring 2022
(i) Utility consumption and meter accuracy are independently validated by the external utility providers. Internal accounting personnel in Purchasing and Physical Plant departments validate billing accuracy to help ensure all consumptions are tracked, and bills paid. Applicable NIR emissions factors were used, and all factor values are included. Office of Sustainability staff and the University Engineer review reporting responses and data independently to help catch inconsistencies and/or errors.
(ii) External third-party validation was conducted by Sustainability Solutions Group (SSG) as part of the attached UM Climate Action Plan, draft submitted for UM Board of Governors approval Spring 2022
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 28,138 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 1,969 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
30,107
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 47 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 8,462 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
8,509
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes | 3,880 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | Yes | 12,395 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | No | --- |
Capital goods | No | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | --- | --- |
Waste generated in operations | Yes | 2,201 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | No | --- |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
18,476
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
Data for FY2019/20 was prepared by an independent third-party consultant, Sustainability Solutions Group (SSG), as part of the attached UM Climate Action Plan, draft submitted for UM Board of Governors approval Spring 2022.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
Yes
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 22 Tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 0.13 Tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 19 Tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | 0.05 Tons |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | Yes |
Area sources | No |
Mobile sources | No |
Commuting | No |
Off-site electricity production | Yes |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
The air emissions inventory was calculated using annual utility consumptions and NIR emissions factors. Consumption data was provided by the Purchasing and Physical Plant departments. Emissions factors are from recognized sources and cited. FY2019/20 data was used because it represented full occupancy and pre-pandemic operating conditions.
Optional Fields
47
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
8,463
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Manitoba Hydro Emissions Factors: https://www.hydro.mb.ca/environment/pdf/ghg-emission-factors.pdf
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.