|Liaison||Juanita Van Norman|
|Submission Date||Aug. 16, 2018|
University of Manitoba
OP-17: Employee Commute Modal Split
|0.89 / 2.00||
Office of Sustainability
Total percentage of the institution’s employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary method of transportation:
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:
The University of Manitoba contracted the Green Action Centre to plan, design and deliver a comprehensive commuting survey open to all students, faculty, employees and other non-University employees working at facilities on campus. The online survey went live January 18th and closed February 6, 2016 with the link circulated via email to all faculty and staff, through weekly e-news to students, and via hard copy to participating non-university offices. The survey was promoted through a wide variety of sources including, but not limited to, radio notifications, e-news, social media and printed posters. The survey reached 4384 respondents which is approximately 11% of the University community. Students were approximately 39%, Employees 37%, Faculty 16% and non-university employees 8%.
The second of the series of surveys was completed during the Winter 2018 term. The survey received over 7000 respondents. Data is currently being reviewed by the Green Action Centre.
The percentage of the institution's employees that use each of the following modes as their primary means of transportation to and from campus::
|Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters)||55.55|
|Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means||12.55|
|Vanpool or carpool||11.55|
|Take a campus shuttle or public transportation||19.80|
|Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped||0.55|
|Telecommute for 50 percent or more of their regular work hours||0|
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.