| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 60.32 |
| Liaison | Andy Mitchell |
| Submission Date | July 16, 2021 |
University of Illinois Chicago
EN-6: Assessing Sustainability Culture
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 1.00 |
Cynthia
Klein-Banai Associate Chancellor for Sustainability Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution conduct an assessment of sustainability culture?:
Yes
Which of the following best describes the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered to::
The entire campus community (students and employees) directly or by representative sample
Which of the following best describes the structure of the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered::
Without a follow-up assessment of the same cohort or representative samples of the same population
A brief description of how and when the cultural assessment(s) were developed and/or adopted:
This assessment was developed during March and April of 2019, and deployed in May to the entire campus community (although there was a focus on in-office employees; so, for example, building engineers and grounds department workers might not have been included due to their work across campus). The survey received IRB exemption as it was not formal research.
A copy or sample of the questions related to sustainability culture:
---
A sample of the questions related to sustainability culture or the website URL where the assessment tool is available:
https://uic.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_37zdy87Ck1lHPtr
A brief description of how representative samples were reached (if applicable) and how the cultural assessment is administered:
Representative samples were reached by explicitly forbidding ecoreps and ccse audiences to take the survey, and instead employing ecoreps to pass the survey along to their units. UIC office employees were targeted and identified through their responses, but others were not prohibited from taking the survey. The cultural assessment was administered through self-reporting by the survey respondents. There was no follow-up assessment of the same cohort.
A brief summary of results from the cultural assessment:
See additional documentation
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.