Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 56.22
Liaison Olivia Wiebe
Submission Date Jan. 28, 2022

STARS v2.2

University of Idaho
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.77 / 3.00 Olivia Wiebe
Sustainability Manager
Office of the President
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory

Has the institution conducted a GHG emissions inventory within the previous three years that includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions? :
Yes

A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
The Sustainability Center and Facilities Management gathered the needed information and used Second Nature's Sustainability Indicator Management and Analysis Platform (SIMAP) to complete the GHG inventory. Additional tools used when more comprehensive tools were available, such as the EPA’s Waste Reduction Model (WARM) for solid waste emissions.

Methodology/tools used:
Scope 1: Data collected from bills to the university (natural gas and fuels) and relevant inventories (animal counts and HVAC refrigerants)
Scope 2: Data collected from utility provider bills to the university
Scope 3:
- Business travel: Air travel data is provided by the Accounts Payable Office.
-Commuting: Data is based on a 2018 commuter survey, fitted to population data.
-Waste: Data provided by Facilities includes landfilled waste after removing recyclable and compostable materials. EPA’s WARM calculator used.
-Food: Data collected by Sodexo in 2019 and fitted to population data for subsequent years.

Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No

A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
---

Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---

Scope 1 GHG emissions
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
Weight in MTCO2e
Stationary combustion 3,529 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) 2,923 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
6,452 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Scope 2 GHG emissions
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year (market-based):
Weight in MTCO2e
Imported electricity 10,491 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Imported thermal energy 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
10,491 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

GHG emissions from biomass combustion
Gross GHG emissions from biogenic sources, performance year:
0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Scope 3 GHG emissions
Does the GHG emissions inventory include Scope 3 emissions from the following sources?:
Yes or No Weight in MTCO2e
Business travel Yes 1,306 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Commuting Yes 1,056 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Purchased goods and services No 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Capital goods No 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 Yes 444 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Waste generated in operations Yes 164 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Other sources Yes 989 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
3,959 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent

A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
- Business travel: Air/vehicle travel data provided by the Accounts Payable Office.
-Commuting: Data is based on a 2018 commuter survey, fitted to population data.
-Waste: Data provided by Facilities includes landfilled waste after removing recyclable and compostable materials.
-Food: Data collected by Sodexo in 2019 and fitted to population data for subsequent years.
T&D losses: Estimated from the EPA’s eGRID program for the NWPP sub-region.
-Wastewater: Data on number of gallons pumped from wells tracked with appropriate treatment type from Moscow wastewater treatment plant.

Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory

Has the institution completed an inventory within the previous three years to quantify its air pollutant emissions?:
No

Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) 24.15 Tons
Sulfur oxides (SOx) 0 Tons
Carbon monoxide (CO) 9.15 Tons
Particulate matter (PM) 11.70 Tons
Ozone (O3) 0 Tons
Lead (Pb) 0 Tons
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) 0 Tons
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) 0 Tons
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations 0 Tons

Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No
Major stationary sources Yes
Area sources No
Mobile sources No
Commuting No
Off-site electricity production No

None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
To complete its air emissions inventory, the UI uses “Method 5” by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature of 120 ±14 °C (248 ±25 °F) or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after the removal of uncombined water.

For more information about the IDEQ/EPA Method 5 visit: https://www.epa.gov/emc/method-5-particulate-matter-pm

Method 5 is also described within the UI Bison Engineering Report, "Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (Methods 2 & 4 Inclusive). The objective of Method 5 is to determine the filterable particulate matter (PM) from a source. Method 5 is an isokinetic sampling method (i.e., the velocity of sample stream entering the nozzle is approximately equal to the velocity of the approaching sample stream) for determination of PM. The exhaust gas stream is sampled along a cross-section of the stack and PM is captured within the nozzle, probe, filter-bell and on the 0.3 micron pore size glass fiber filter. The filter is maintained at a temperature of 248°F±25°F followed by impingers maintained at a temperature below 64°F. Bison uses a Method 5 sampling train with a stainless steel probe liner and nozzles to gather the particulate sample. Method 5 incorporates Method 2 "velocity measurements" and Method 4 "moisture measurements." Field data, spreadsheet calculations, example calculations, and pitot tube, probe alignment and thermal indicator calibrations are included in the report appendices”.

Optional Fields

Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity (location-based):
---

Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Notes:

Air Pollutant Inventory:
The university measures air pollutant emissions from the wood fired boiler only as required by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality as a Tier 1 emitter. Air pollutant emissions from natural gas or vehicle use are not inventoried, only carbon.

For more information about the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality please visit: http://www.deq.idaho.gov/air-quality/

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.