| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 76.08 |
| Liaison | Tess Esposito |
| Submission Date | March 1, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Dayton
OP-16: Student Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.76 / 2.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total percentage of students (graduate and undergraduate) that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary means of transportation:
88.06
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:
Data sources: snapshot of 2017-2018 school year parking pass data; Fall 2017 factbook enrollment statistics.
Calculation: (Total students - Commuter lot student parking pass total) / total students
The campus is highly residential, and is surrounded by other residential areas that are not owned by the university. Most students walk or bike to campus. Those that don't almost always purchase a commuter parking pass, so the ratio of commuter parking passes sold to total students enrolled is a conservative estimate of how many students drive a single-occupant vehicle. We suspect that many of these students are carpooling or using the campus shuttle for most of their commutes, but it is not considered in this data because it has not been measured.
Optional Fields
| Percentage (0-100) | |
| Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) | --- |
| Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means | --- |
| Vanpool or carpool | --- |
| Take a campus shuttle or public transportation | --- |
| Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped | --- |
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.