Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 68.18
Liaison Marianne Martin
Submission Date Dec. 3, 2024

STARS v3.0

University of Colorado Boulder
PA-3: Institutional Governance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.75 / 4.00 Heid VanGenderen
Chief Sustainability Officer
University of Colorado Boulder
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

3.1 Student participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which students can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which students can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:

Students have several avenues through which they can make their views known and through which they can democratically participate in sustainablity decisions. CU Boulder's Student Government (CUSG) is one avenue. As the most autonomous student government in the nation, CUSG is responsible for allocating over $34 million in student fees to improve the lives of CU students. Secondly, there are student representatives on both Sustainabliity Councils that exist on the campus. The Council appointed by the Chancellor as equal representation between stduents, faculty and staff and holds quarterly public sessions to invite input from students, faculty and staff. See https://www.colorado.edu/sustainability/sustainability-council. The Executive Sustainabliity Council chaired by the Executive Vice Chancellor and COO also has two student representatives on it representing both undergraduate and graduate students. See: https://www.colorado.edu/sustainability/campus-sustainability-executive-council


Are one or more student representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining student representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:

Policy 2.E: Faculty, Staff, and Student Representatives to the Board of Regents The chairs of the Faculty Council, University Staff Council, and Intercampus Student Forum shall be representatives to the Board of Regents, communicating with the system administration and the board regarding matters of interest to their respective universitywide constituencies. These representatives shall be provided an opportunity to make reports to the board at each regularly scheduled board business meeting, as provided in the meeting agenda. In the event that a representative is unable to attend a meeting, they may, with the consent of the board chair, designate another member of their constituent body to make the report.


Does at least one student representative have voting rights on the highest decision-making body?:
No

Description of other mechanisms used to consult students on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:

CU is home to the longest-standing student-led environmental center of any campus in the country. Established in 1970, the Environmental Center has a professional staff of 15 and employs over 150 students in the course of the academic year. The Center is governed by the Environmental Board which is a joint board of CU Student Government. Students are represented on multiple committees, planning groups and campus decision making bodies with seats dedicated to CUSG and the Environmental Board representatives (ie Campus Sustainability Council). https://www.colorado.edu/ecenter/


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.1:
0.75

3.2 Academic staff participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:

The Boulder Faculty Assembly is the representative body of the faculty in the shared governance of the CU-Boulder campus. A guiding principle of that shared governance, recognized by the Board of Regents of the University of Colorado, is that the faculty and the administration shall collaborate in major decisions affecting the welfare of the University. In practice, the BFA has primary responsibility for setting academic policy and is expected to advise the administration on other policies. See: https://www.colorado.edu/bfa/


Are one or more academic staff representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:

1) Faculty are primarily represented in the shared governance structure through the Boulder Faculty Assembly, a strong body with a strong voice on behalf of faculty. See: https://www.colorado.edu/bfa/ 2) Policy 2.E: Faculty, Staff, and Student Representatives to the Board of Regents
The chairs of the Faculty Council, University Staff Council, and Intercampus Student Forum shall be representatives to the Board of Regents, communicating with the system administration and the board regarding matters of interest to their respective universitywide constituencies. These representatives shall be provided an opportunity to make reports to the board at each regularly scheduled board business meeting, as provided in the meeting agenda. In the event that a representative is unable to attend a meeting, they may, with the consent of the board chair, designate another member of their constituent body to make the report.


Does at least one academic staff representative have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Description of other mechanisms used to consult academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:

Faculty are represented on multiple committees, planning groups and campus decision making bodies with seats dedicated to BFA or other Faculty representation (ie Campus Sustainability Council).


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.2:
0.75

3.3 Non-academic staff participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which non-academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which non-academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:

Non-academic staff is represented through the Staff Council. The University of Colorado Boulder has an established tradition of shared governance, recognizing the tremendous value of suggestions received from all segments of the University community. CU Boulder Staff Council was created and established to ensure that all staff members have the opportunity to be actively involved in setting the priorities and future direction of the university. CU Boulder's Staff Council is a team of elected members from across the campus. They represent the interests of the campus' staff by advocating on a variety of issues, proposing policies, serving in an advisory role to administration, and facilitating a variety of events to bring collaborative opportunities to the campus. See: https://www.colorado.edu/staffcouncil/staff-council-overview.


Are one or more staff members representing non-managerial workers included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining non-academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:

1) Staff are primarily represented in the shared governance structure through the Staff Council. Staff Council represents, informs and educates staff employees by serving as a liaison between employees and Boulder campus, University system and State administration. Staff Council recommend proposals to the administration that are designed to improve morale and advocate for the rights of staff employees. https://www.colorado.edu/staffcouncil/staff-council-overview 2) Policy 2.E: Faculty, Staff, and Student Representatives to the Board of Regents The chairs of the Faculty Council, University Staff Council, and Intercampus Student Forum shall be representatives to the Board of Regents, communicating with the system administration and the board regarding matters of interest to their respective universitywide constituencies. These representatives shall be provided an opportunity to make reports to the board at each regularly scheduled board business meeting, as provided in the meeting agenda. In the event that a representative is unable to attend a meeting, they may, with the consent of the board chair, designate another member of their constituent body to make the report.


Does at least one staff member representing non-managerial workers have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Description of other mechanisms used to consult non-academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.3:
0.75

3.4 Community participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which local community-based organizations not affiliated with the institution can democratically participate in its governance?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which local community-based organizations can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
---

Has the institution used one or more ad hoc mechanisms during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ad hoc mechanisms used during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:

CU Boulder convenes quarterly meetings with the City , Boulder Valley School District, and Boulder County to discuss sustainability work and explore partnership programs based on shared sustainability and other goals. The Office of Government and Community Engagement meets with a variety of ad hoc and local community based organizations to discuss plans and policies, such as the Boulder Chamber of Commerce, Downtown Boulder Partnership, Via Mobility, Commuting Solutions, Boulder Transportation Connections, Boulder Connectors, the City of Boulder, Boulder County Commissioners, NAACP, Latino Chamber, Tribes, neighborhood groups, civic associations and the Hill Revitalization Working Group.


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.4:
0.50

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:
---

Additional documentation for this credit:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.