Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 68.39 |
Liaison | Marianne Martin |
Submission Date | Sept. 22, 2021 |
University of Colorado Boulder
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.73 / 3.00 |
Bryan
Birosak Director of Utility Services Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
Master spreadsheet created with all required data; distributed to those who had the data; follow up to acquire data; compilation of the data into the spreadsheet then entered into the Second Nature reporting form
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 45,056 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 1,392 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
46,867
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 99,221 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
79,082
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes |
19,923
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Date Revised: March 3, 2023
|
Commuting | Yes | 10,254 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | No | --- |
Capital goods | No | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | Yes | 848 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
41,640
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
Scope 3 GHG emissions were calculated using various custom tools: GHG emissions from business travel is calculated using air miles travelled, as provided by Christopherson Business Travel, in conjunction with iBank Travel Management © Cornerstone Information Systems; GHG from commuting is calculated using institutional data provided by the UCB Office of Data Analytics (ODA) and applying it to commute mode data generated by various surveys of faculty, staff, and students, including those conducted as part of the 2019 Transportation Master Plan. Conversion factors match those provided by the TMP consultant, Fehr & Peers; GHG associated with waste generated in operations is calculated using scale-based weight tickets provided by Facilities Management and conversion factors provided by the USEPA (Documentation Chapters for Greenhouse Gas Emission, Energy and Economic Factors Used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) | US EPA).
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
Yes
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 53.99 Metric tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 9.41 Metric tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 14.67 Metric tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | 2.45 Metric tons |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | 0 Metric tons |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | 1.58 Metric tons |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | Yes |
Area sources | No |
Mobile sources | No |
Commuting | No |
Off-site electricity production | No |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
Please note Utilities only manages the air emissions for the district energy plants. Utilities does not maintain a “CU Boulder air emissions inventory”.
The District Energy Plants at CU Boulder utilize industrial grade Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) that are 3rd party certified in accordance with our air permit and all regulatory requirements. The custom CEMS are outfitted with facility specific instrumentation (gas analyzers, flow monitors, etc), sample handling systems, gas calibration systems, and a Data Acquisition and Handling System (DAHS) for the collection and reporting of data.
The CEMS DAHS provides the data for the Stars Report.
The District Energy Plants at CU Boulder utilize industrial grade Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) that are 3rd party certified in accordance with our air permit and all regulatory requirements. The custom CEMS are outfitted with facility specific instrumentation (gas analyzers, flow monitors, etc), sample handling systems, gas calibration systems, and a Data Acquisition and Handling System (DAHS) for the collection and reporting of data.
The CEMS DAHS provides the data for the Stars Report.
Optional Fields
---
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.