Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 68.35 |
Liaison | Alex Roman Gonzalez |
Submission Date | March 3, 2023 |
University of Cincinnati
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.74 / 5.00 |
Andrew
Porter Director Planning + Design + Constuction |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
31,651
Full-time equivalent of employees:
7,094
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
63.50
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
A combination of city and regional transportation modeling data, internal UC data (e.g. student and staff records), has been used in the previous decade to estimate commuting patterns and associated GHG emissions.
In fall 2021, UC instituted a regular survey of sustainability, attitudes and behaviors to all UC students, staff and faculty. The Office of Sustainability worked with a faculty effort in surveying to ensure a representative sample was obtained. The commuting data reported above is based on the results of that survey.
See "2021 survey results" at the bottom of this page: https://www.uc.edu/about/admin-finance/planning-design-construction/sustainability/links-&-resources/on-campus-resources.html
In fall 2021, UC instituted a regular survey of sustainability, attitudes and behaviors to all UC students, staff and faculty. The Office of Sustainability worked with a faculty effort in surveying to ensure a representative sample was obtained. The commuting data reported above is based on the results of that survey.
See "2021 survey results" at the bottom of this page: https://www.uc.edu/about/admin-finance/planning-design-construction/sustainability/links-&-resources/on-campus-resources.html
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
16
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
A combination of city and regional transportation modeling data, internal UC data (e.g. student and staff records), has been used in the previous decade to estimate commuting patterns and associated GHG emissions. In fall 2021, In fall 2021, UC instituted a regular survey of sustainability, attitudes and behaviors to all UC students, staff and faculty. The Office of Sustainability worked with a faculty effort in surveying to ensure a representative sample was obtained. The commuting data reported above is based on the results of that survey.
See "2021 survey results" at the bottom of this page: https://www.uc.edu/about/admin-finance/planning-design-construction/sustainability/links-&-resources/on-campus-resources.html
See "2021 survey results" at the bottom of this page: https://www.uc.edu/about/admin-finance/planning-design-construction/sustainability/links-&-resources/on-campus-resources.html
Optional Fields
Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
Single-occupancy vehicle | 36.50 | 82.70 |
Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 54.50 | 6.90 |
Vanpool or carpool | 4.50 | 7.10 |
Public transport or campus shuttle | 1.50 | 2.10 |
Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | --- | 0 |
Distance education / telecommute | --- | 1.30 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
See UC's sustainability website for information available to students, staff and faculty to promote sustainable commuting. https://www.uc.edu/about/admin-finance/planning-design-construction/sustainability/campus-initiatives/transportation.html
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.