Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 50.50 |
Liaison | Ryan Chabot |
Submission Date | March 2, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Central Florida
OP-2: Outdoor Air Quality
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.50 / 1.00 |
Yara
Watson Colon Sustainability Specialist II Sustainability Initiatives |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1
No
None
A brief description of the policies and/or guidelines to improve outdoor air quality and minimize air pollutant emissions from mobile sources:
---
Part 2
Yes
Weight of the following categories of air emissions from stationary sources::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 16.74 Tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 0 Tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 114 Tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | 0 Tons |
Ozone (O3) | 0 Tons |
Lead (Pb) | 0 Tons |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | 0 Tons |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | 0 Tons |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | 12.32 Tons |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
The University of Central Florida (UCF) was issued permit 0950015-012-AO on June 23, 2016, for a natural gas-fired 5,500 kW Mitsubishi engine and generator (EU 004). The test was conducted in accordance with the test protocol submitted on behalf of UCF on October 12, 2016, and was observed by representatives of the Orange County Environmental Protection Division (EPD).
In summary, a third party servicer attached their equipment to the stack. Three one hour runs under full load were measured. During those three runs, the exhaust from the engine was sampled and a visual emissions test was performed. The figures reported to STARS are averages of the three runs (lb/hr data was converted to ton/yr).
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.