Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 76.34 |
Liaison | Elida Erickson |
Submission Date | March 1, 2019 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of California, Santa Cruz
OP-2: Outdoor Air Quality
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
![]() |
1.00 / 1.00 |
Justin
Delemus EH&S EH&S |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution have policies and/or guidelines in place to improve outdoor air quality and minimize air pollutant emissions from mobile sources on campus?:
Yes
A brief description of the policies and/or guidelines to improve outdoor air quality and minimize air pollutant emissions from mobile sources:
UCSC maintains over 80 air permits from the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD). Equipment required to have an air permit to regulate emissions include: Cogeneration engines, hot water boilers, dust collection systems, emergency generator engines, spray paint booths and gasoline dispensing pumps.
Has the institution completed an inventory of significant air emissions from stationary campus sources or else verified that no such emissions are produced?:
Yes
Weight of the following categories of air emissions from stationary sources::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 6.35 Metric tons |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 0.09 Metric tons |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | 15.42 Metric tons |
Particulate matter (PM) | 0.73 Metric tons |
Ozone (O3) | Metric tons |
Lead (Pb) | 0 Metric tons |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | 1.91 Metric tons |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | 0.24 Metric tons |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
In most cases, equipment specifications, EPA emissions factors and fuel consumption are use to estimate emission potential. In other cases, actual emissions are calculated from emission factors based on use.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.