Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 79.54 |
Liaison | Kelli O'Day |
Submission Date | June 20, 2023 |
University of California, Davis
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
4.96 / 6.00 |
Camille
Kirk Director of Sustainability and Campus Sustainability Planner Office of Sustainability |
Part 1. Site energy use per unit of floor area
Performance year energy consumption
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 186,518,683 Kilowatt-hours | 636,401.75 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 29,705,834.65 Kilowatt-hours | 101,356.31 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 1,020,071.01 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
Performance year building space
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 2,130,139 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 220,328 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 692,159 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Performance year heating and cooling degree days
Degree days | |
Heating degree days | 2,847.90 Degree-Days (°F) |
Cooling degree days | 1,784.10 Degree-Days (°F) |
Total degree days, performance year:
Performance period
Start date | End date | |
Performance period | Jan. 1, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2021 |
Metric used in scoring for Part 1
Part 2. Reduction in source energy use per unit of floor area
Baseline year energy consumption
STARS 2.2 requires electricity data in kilowatt-hours (kWh). If a baseline has already been established in a previous version of STARS and the institution wishes to continue using it, the electricity data must be re-entered in kWh. To convert existing electricity figures from MMBtu to kWh, simply multiply by 293.07107 MMBtu/kWh.
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 238,796,440 Kilowatt-hours | 814,773.45 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 1,326,074 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
Baseline year building space
Baseline period
Start date | End date | |
Baseline period | July 1, 2005 | June 30, 2008 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
Source energy
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy | Source energy | |
Performance year | 0.13 MMBtu per square foot | 0.22 MMBtu per square foot |
Baseline year | 0.22 MMBtu per square foot | 0.39 MMBtu per square foot |
Metric used in scoring for Part 2
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
UC Davis buildings also have a TherMOOstat and TherMOOfan. The Energy Conservation Office built the TherMOOstat so that students, faculty and staff can let the energy conservation team know how they think the rooms feel on campus. It can be used for any building on the main campus, as often as any user likes. With the comfort feedback that is sent back to the team, it crowdsources indoor comfort and gives everyone the opportunity to contribute to comfort and energy savings. The TherMOOfan is another opportunity presented by the Energy Conservation Office to improve energy efficiency and campus comfort. To accomplish both in large classrooms, high volume, low-speed (HVLS) ceiling fans have been incorporated. HVLS fans can circulate a high volume of air throughout a large space efficiently, thus reducing the need for heating and cooling. The HVLS fan also provides comfort, as classrooms can maintain a more consistent temperature. To take a step further, the UC Davis Energy Conservation Office has added a code to the fans to turn off or on based on expected occupancy in the room, and to set a default speed in rooms when no votes are received (through TherMOOstat). The code also takes into account the outside air temperature, so when a student first walks into the classroom, the fans will operate at optimal speed.
The UC Davis Office of Sustainability offers a Green Workplace certification program that teaches participants how to green their actions and workspaces (offices, labs, and field work). Energy conservation and efficiency practices are part of this program. In addition, the Office of Sustainability offers the Aggie Green Pledge program, a personal sustainability take-action program that includes energy conservation and efficiency pledges.
CEED: https://facilities.ucdavis.edu/energy-engineering/ceed
TherMOOstat: https://facilities.ucdavis.edu/energy-engineering/controls-comfort.
Green Workplace: https://sustainability.ucdavis.edu/action/green_workplace/index.html
Aggie Green Pledge program: https://sustainability.ucdavis.edu/action/pledge/index.html
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
The Energy Conservation Office is also proactive in reducing energy waste on holidays. By leveraging the campus's complex digital building control system, our engineers implement new holiday schedules and temperature setpoints for building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. For example, during the holidays, some buildings are left completely vacant, which means they don't need their temperatures controlled as tightly. Therefore, temperature settings in these buildings are relaxed significantly during the holidays. The relaxed temperature settings also prevent long warm-up or cool-down times after the holidays, meaning shorter times for a building to return to normal operations after the holidays.
For more information: https://facilities.ucdavis.edu/energy-engineering/projects
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
Hutchison Intramural Field Lighting article, “Lighting the Way for Intramural Sports”: https://facilities.ucdavis.edu/news/lighting-way-intramural-sports
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
Campus Design Guide: https://dcm.ucdavis.edu/2019-campus-design-guide
Physical Design Framework: https://campusplanning.ucdavis.edu/physical-design-framework
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
More detailed explanations of the listed projects, and other ongoing projects can be found here: https://facilities.ucdavis.edu/energy-engineering/projects.
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Please note that UC Davis does not import steam, hot water, and/or chilled water. The campus has its own district steam heating and chilled water systems.
Alex Berk, student employee at UCD Sustainability, assisted in compiling this credit response.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.