Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 74.81
Liaison Kelli O'Day
Submission Date March 6, 2020

STARS v2.2

University of California, Davis
PA-10: Sustainable Investment

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.85 / 5.00 Camille Kirk
Director of Sustainability and Campus Sustainability Planner
Office of Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1. Positive sustainability investment

Total value of the investment pool:
13,400,000,000 US/Canadian $

Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) 82,000,000 US/Canadian $
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) 403,000,000 US/Canadian $
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) 78,400,000 US/Canadian $
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent 0 US/Canadian $
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) 0 US/Canadian $
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment 0 US/Canadian $

If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:

A brief description of the companies, funds, and/or institutions referenced above:
Congruent Ventures: clean tech investment firm which sources investment opportunities from throughout the UC system.

Pattern Energy: a renewable power developer.

TPG Rise Fund: impact investment fund specifically designed to address challenges identified by the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

Various public equity, real asset and real estate holdings in alternative fueling infrastructure development, stationary fuel cells, solar equipment, energy efficiency technologies, LEED and/or EnergyStar certified green buildings and sustainable water technologies.

Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
4.20

Part 2. Investor engagement

Sustainable investment policy 

Does the institution have a publicly available sustainable investment policy?:
Yes

None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
None
The sustainable investment policy:
https://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/policies/6102.pdf

None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
Yes

A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
We approach sustainability both from a risk management and investment opportunity perspective. We believe that sustainability can help us increase our risk-adjusted returns over the long term by helping us manage long horizon risks. As part of the overall due diligence process and ongoing assessment every investment manager is reviewed and scored against the UC’s sustainability framework.

With regard to investment managers, we engage in ongoing dialogue with our external managers to ensure they understand the priority we place on sustainability and to make sure we understand how they assess ESG risks and opportunities in their investment process. We have also added a description of our Sustainable Investing Framework into our standardized external manager contracts and communications, including specific information about securities that should not be purchased on our behalf.

In 2019, the endowment announced its commitment to sell its holdings of companies that own fossil fuel reserves due to concerns over stranded asset risks stemming from climate change. The endowment has largely fulfilled this commitment. Also, in December 2019, the endowment made a $30 million commitment to 8 Minute Energy, a solar energy and battery storage company.

In 2017 the endowment made a $50 million commitment to Congruent Ventures, a clean energy seed-stage venture capital fund which sources investment opportunities from throughout the UC system. The endowment also made a $25 million investment in Pattern Energy, a renewable power company. In 2017 the endowment also made a $35 million investment in TPG Rise Impact Fund, TPG’s impact investment fund.

In 2018 the endowment made additional investments in renewable assets through ManuLife, John Hancock and Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

Proxy voting 

Has the institution engaged in proxy voting, either by its CIR or other committee or through the use of guidelines, to promote sustainability during the previous three years?:
Yes

None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---

None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
We use the ISS Socially Responsible Investing proxy voting guidelines, which can be found at: https://www.issgovernance.com/file/policy/active/specialty/SRI-US-Voting-Guidelines.pdf.

Shareholder resolutions 

Has the institution filed or co-filed one or more shareholder resolutions that address sustainability or submitted one or more letters about social or environmental responsibility to a company in which it holds investments during the previous three years?:
Yes

Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
In 2017 - 2019, the endowment engaged directly with corporations in our portfolio regarding gender and racial diversity on the Board of Directors. Specifically, in coalition with other large public California institutional investors, we wrote to every California-based company in our portfolio that did not have at least one woman on its board. We asked for a dialogue with the Board’s Nominating & Governance Committees and, as a result, spoke directly with dozens of companies over the past three years. Our specific recommendations to the Nominating & Governance Committees included incorporating procedures by which women and diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds are identified for consideration in every search for a board nominee (a practice commonly known as “the Rooney Rule,” after its successful use in the National Football League.)

Divestment efforts and negative screens

Does the institution participate in a public divestment effort and/or have a publicly available investment policy with negative screens?:
Yes

A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
We use publicly available, investment quality data from MSCI (namely, the MSCI ACWI IMI ex Tobacco ex Fossil Fuel Index) to screen public equities and debt that own fossil fuel reserves. The Index defines “fossil fuel” to consist of thermal coal, oil and gas.

In addition, UC Investments applies other negative screens to its investments, namely: companies doing business in Sudan; tobacco related businesses; firearms manufacturers; and businesses which operate private prisons in the United States.

Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
100

Investor networks 

Does the institution engage in policy advocacy by participating in investor networks and/or engage in inter-organizational collaborations to share best practices?:
Yes

None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
UC Investments participates in a number of investor networks to engage in policy advocacy and to share best practices, including, e.g., Ceres Investor Network on Climate Change & Sustainability, the UN Principles for Responsible Investment, the Intentional Endowments Network, the Council of Institutional Investors, the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures and the Thirty Percent Coalition.

Influential investors from leading asset management firms, public pension funds, labor and socially-responsible investment funds, foundations, endowments and family offices make up the Ceres Investor Network. Ceres Investor Network members engage and collaborate on environmental, social, and governance issues to advance leading investment practices, corporate engagement strategies and policy solutions through working groups and shared learning opportunities, such as webinars and events. Ceres works with investors specifically to better manage carbon, water and supply chain risks, and ramp up global investments in clean energy and sustainable food and water systems. In addition, Ceres Investor Network members pressure stock exchanges and capital market regulators to improve climate and sustainability risk disclosure, and opportunities to advocate for stronger climate, clean energy and water policies at all levels of government.

The Intentional Endowments Network is a peer learning network of colleges, universities, and other mission-driven institutional investors working together to achieve their risk and return objectives through investment actions that create a thriving, sustainable economy.

The FSB Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) will develop voluntary, consistent climate-related financial risk disclosures for use by companies in providing information to investors, lenders, insurers, and other stakeholders. The Task Force will consider the physical, liability and transition risks associated with climate change and what constitutes effective financial disclosures across industries. The work and recommendations of the Task Force will help companies understand what financial markets want from disclosure in order to measure and respond to climate change risks, and encourage firms to align their disclosures with investors’ needs.

The United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment is an international network of investors working together to put the six principles into practice.

The Council on Institutional Investors is an international non-profit organization representing the voice of corporate governance, supporting effective corporate governance practices and strong shareowner rights.

The Thirty Percent Coalition, founded in 2011, is a pioneer advocating for diversity in the corporate boardroom. Our vision is for senior leadership and board of directors to reflect the gender, racial and ethnic diversity of the United States workforce. The mission of the Thirty Percent Coalition is to promote gender diversity, including women of color, on corporate boards.

Optional Fields 

Website URL where information about the institution’s sustainable investment efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-09-16/divestment-fossil-fuel-university-of-california-climate-change

https://www.msci.com/eqb/methodology/meth_docs/MSCI_Global_ex_Fossil_Fuels_Indexes_Methodology_Dec2017.pdf

https://www.ucop.edu/investment-office/_files/sustainable-investment-framework.pdf

All information for this credit was provided by the University of California Office of the Chief Investment Officer.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.