| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 78.50 |
| Liaison | Marina Zdobnova |
| Submission Date | Aug. 16, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of California, Berkeley
OP-17: Employee Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.21 / 2.00 |
Jack
Chang STARS Assessment Fellow (ERG) Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total percentage of the institution’s employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary method of transportation:
60.60
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:
Every three years the campus conducts a comprehensive transportation survey of 9,300 faculty and staff to determine mode split, with a response rate of about a third of respondents. These data are from 2016.
Optional Fields
| Percentage (0-100) | |
| Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) | 39.40 |
| Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means | 23.30 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 8.20 |
| Take a campus shuttle or public transportation | 27.30 |
| Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped | 1.20 |
| Telecommute for 50 percent or more of their regular work hours | 2.60 |
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Data show that 2.6% of the employees telecommute more than 50% of their work time. The campus survey let respondents indicate multiple modes of transportation, explaining why the sum of the different modes is higher than the total figure entered in the first field.
The information in this field was provided by the campus Alternative Transportation Program, which is part of Parking and Transportation.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.