| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66.35 |
| Liaison | Trevor Ledbetter |
| Submission Date | May 2, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Arizona
OP-12: Electronics Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.49 / 1.00 |
Benjamin
Champion N/A Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total expenditures on desktop and laptop computers, displays, thin clients, tablets/slates, televisions, and imaging equipment:
607,142.93
US/Canadian $
Expenditures on EPEAT registered desktop and laptop computers, displays, thin clients, tablets/slates, televisions, and imaging equipment::
| Expenditure Per Level | |
| EPEAT Gold | 287,097.95 US/Canadian $ |
| EPEAT Silver | 11,607.50 US/Canadian $ |
| EPEAT Bronze | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Percentage of expenditures on electronic products that are EPEAT Gold registered:
47.29
Do the figures reported above include leased equipment?:
No
A brief description of the time period from which the figures reported above are drawn (i.e. one-year time period or representative sample):
The majority of this data is from the Arizona BuyWays Program, Purchase Orders information, and P-Card purchases made from July 2010 until February 3, 2012. UA currently has no way of tracking EPEAT purchases in 2016, but a new partnership between our purchasing department and an analytics firm will hopefully provide this ability for future analyses.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Expenditure data is based on information provided by Procurement and Contracting Services on the vendors that the University of Arizona utilizes for office and computer equipment purchases. The majority of this data is from the Arizona BuyWays Program, Purchase Orders information, and P-Card purchases made from July 2010 until February 3, 2012. UA currently has no way of tracking EPEAT purchases in 2016, but a new partnership between our purchasing department and an analytics firm will hopefully provide this ability for future analyses.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.