| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 45.28 |
| Liaison | Cynthia Philippe |
| Submission Date | May 12, 2021 |
Université du Québec à Montréal
EN-7: Employee Educators Program
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.51 / 3.00 |
Cynthia
Philippe Sustainability advisor Service du développement organisationnel |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Percentage of employees served by a peer-to-peer, sustainability educators program
5,295
Total number of employees served by a peer-to-peer sustainability outreach and education program:
5,295
Percentage of employees served by a peer-to-peer sustainability outreach and education program:
100
1st program
UQAM eco-ambassadors network / Réseau des écoambassadeurs de l'UQAM
A brief description of the employee educators program (1st program):
VRADHO invites each organizational unit manager to nominate members as eco-ambassador, eco-ambassador. They act as agents, agents of mobilization and change within the workplace.
These people are called to:
play a proactive role by adopting eco-responsible practices and instilling values relating to eco-citizenship;
encourage members of their unit to introduce eco-responsible practices into their daily activities;
communicate relevant information on eco-responsibility within their unit, department or organization.
Annually, the list of new eco-ambassadors is submitted to the Institutional Committee for the Application of the Eco-Responsibility Policy (CIME) to confirm its dynamism and the maintenance of a sufficient contingent to exercise the aforementioned roles.
These people are called to:
play a proactive role by adopting eco-responsible practices and instilling values relating to eco-citizenship;
encourage members of their unit to introduce eco-responsible practices into their daily activities;
communicate relevant information on eco-responsibility within their unit, department or organization.
Annually, the list of new eco-ambassadors is submitted to the Institutional Committee for the Application of the Eco-Responsibility Policy (CIME) to confirm its dynamism and the maintenance of a sufficient contingent to exercise the aforementioned roles.
A brief description of the employee educators program’s target audience (1st program):
All the employee of the university community
Number of trained employee educators (1st program):
106
Number of weeks the employee educators program is active annually (1st program):
46
Average or expected number of hours worked weekly per trained employee educator (1st program):
0.50
Total number of hours worked annually by trained employee educators (1st program):
23
Website URL where information about the employee educators program is available (1st program) :
If reporting employees served by additional peer-to-peer programs, provide:
2nd Program
N/A
A brief description of the employee educators program (2nd program):
N/A
A brief description of the employee educators program’s target audience (2nd program):
N/A
Number of trained employee educators (2nd program):
0
Number of weeks the employee educators program is active annually (2nd program):
0
Average or expected number of hours worked weekly per trained employee educator (2nd program):
0
Total number of hours worked annually by trained employee educators (2nd program):
0
Website URL where information about the employee educators program is available (2nd program):
---
If reporting employees served by more than two programs, provide:
Additional Programs
N/A
Number of trained employee educators (all other programs):
0
Number of weeks, on average, the employee educators programs are active annually (all other programs):
0
Average or expected number of hours worked weekly per trained employee educator (all other programs):
0
Total number of hours worked annually by trained employee educators (all other programs):
0
Part 2. Educator hours per employee served by a peer-to-peer program
23
Hours worked annually by trained employee sustainability educators per employee served by a peer-to-peer program:
0.00
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.