Overall Rating | Bronze |
---|---|
Overall Score | 31.17 |
Liaison | José Otazú Mejía |
Submission Date | Jan. 2, 2024 |
Universidad Científica del Sur
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.29 / 3.00 |
José Miguel
Otazú Mejía Environmental Sustainability Officer Environmental Engineering Program |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
The methodology used is in accordance with ISO 1406:2018. Furthermore, it is employed to complement the IPCC 2006 Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
Yes
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
Internal verification is carried out by subject matter expert teachers after the team (comprised of teachers and students) calculates the footprint for each year. Subsequently, the footprint was verified by the accrediting body AENOR for the years 2019 and 2020 at this time. Verification for the calculations of the year 2021 and 2022 is expected in the future.
The external verification process is carried out for each footprint; attached is the verification for the year 2020 conducted by AENOR, and the verification for the year 2021 is scheduled to be conducted at the end of 2023.
The external verification process is carried out for each footprint; attached is the verification for the year 2020 conducted by AENOR, and the verification for the year 2021 is scheduled to be conducted at the end of 2023.
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 7.83 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 22.03 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
29.86
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 159.95 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
159.95
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0.05
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | Yes | 0.49 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | Yes | 2,511.48 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | Yes | 0.35 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | --- | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | Yes | 88.83 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | No | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
2,601.15
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
The approach employed to measure Scope 3 emissions at a university primarily focuses on commuting, the major emission source, from home to work. Notably, in 2021, emissions were low due to the COVID-19 pandemic's ripple effects. However, it is anticipated that transportation values will rise in 2022 and 2023 as conditions normalize. This comprehensive assessment allows the university to track and manage its carbon footprint, adapting strategies to address environmental concerns effectively.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
No
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | --- |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | --- |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | --- |
Particulate matter (PM) | --- |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | --- |
Area sources | --- |
Mobile sources | --- |
Commuting | --- |
Off-site electricity production | --- |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
---
Optional Fields
159.95
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.