| Overall Rating | Reporter |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | |
| Liaison | Tatiana Molina Velásquez |
| Submission Date | March 4, 2022 |
Universidad CES
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
Reporter |
Tatiana
Molina Jefe sostenibilidad Sostenibilidad |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
María Camila Gómez Tenorio, external consultant corporate sustainability ConTREEbute
Wendy Paola Ortega, social management coordinator, ces university
Tatiana Molina, head of sustainability university ces
Gabriel Jaime López Palacio, planning analyst university ces
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
An internal audit of the sources of information and the data collected is carried out. The data is housed in an online statistical bulletin. At first, the data is shared by the primary sources in charge of information management and, at a second moment, the information is reviewed by the planning area that validates the transparency of the data and that it is adequate. Once the review is done, the report is written and the data is aligned to international standards such as the GRI standard. An external consultant validates compliance with the minimum requirements.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.