| Overall Rating | Reporter |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | |
| Liaison | Tatiana Molina Velásquez |
| Submission Date | March 4, 2022 |
Universidad CES
PA-3: Inclusive and Participatory Governance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
Reporter |
Tatiana
Molina Jefe sostenibilidad Sostenibilidad |
Does the institution have formal participatory or shared governance bodies through which the following stakeholders can regularly participate in the governance of the institution?:
| Yes or No | |
| Students | Yes |
| Academic staff | Yes |
| Non-academic staff | Yes |
A brief description of the institution’s formal participatory or shared governance bodies:
The governance structure of the university is made up of:
1. The Founders' Chamber: it is the highest regulatory body of the CES University and is made up of the founders and by those who, according to the statutory regulations, replace the members of the Chamber who have ceased to belong to it for the stipulated reasons. in the statutes.
2. The Superior Council: it is the highest management body of the CES University. Each year the student representative is elected and, every two years, the representatives of graduates and teachers are elected.
3. Rector: is the academic and administrative authority in charge of directing the institution in accordance with the policies outlined by the Superior Council. He is appointed by the Superior Council for periods of three years and can be re-elected. He is also the legal representative of the CES University.
4. The Academic Council: is the collegiate body in charge of the proper functioning of the university in its academic aspects. It is made up of the rector, the general secretary, the directors, deans and heads of programs, as well as representatives of teachers and students.
5. The Administrative Committee: it is the collegiate body in charge of the proper functioning of the university in its administrative aspects. Its members are the rector, the general secretary, the directors and a representative of the deans.
Total number of individuals on the institution’s highest governing body:
Number of students representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
Number of academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
Number of non-academic staff representing their peers as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
Number of women serving as official members of the institution’s highest governing body:
Percentage of official members of the highest governing body that are women:
Website URL where information about the institution’s highest governing body may be found:
Does the institution host or support one or more formal bodies through which external stakeholders have a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them?:
A brief description of the campus-community council or equivalent body that gives external stakeholders a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them:
The construction of the strategic development plan was carried out with the participation of interest groups, including external stakeholders, with a voice to identify the material issues that will determine the management and institutional decisions that affect them or are of interest to them and us.
The Administrative Committee, which is the collegiate body in charge of the proper functioning of the university in its administrative aspects. Its members are the rector, the general secretary, the directors and a representative of the deans; gives external stakeholders a regular voice in institutional decisions that affect them
Number of people from underrepresented groups serving as official members of the institution’s highest governing body.:
Website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.