Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 49.83
Liaison YOLANDA MENDOZA CAVAZOS
Submission Date June 30, 2022

STARS v2.2

Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 5.47 / 8.00 Yolanda Mendoza
MSc.
Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Figures needed to determine total waste generated (and diverted):
Performance Year Baseline Year
Materials recycled 9.39 Metric tons 36.58 Metric tons
Materials composted 11.11 Metric tons 42.50 Metric tons
Materials donated or re-sold 14.25 Metric tons 54.46 Metric tons
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion 0 Metric tons 0 Metric tons
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator 187.74 Metric tons 717.43 Metric tons
Total waste generated 222.49 Metric tons 850.97 Metric tons

A brief description of the residual conversion facility:
---

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date End Date
Performance Period Jan. 1, 2021 Dec. 31, 2021
Baseline Period Jan. 1, 2015 Dec. 8, 2015

A brief description of when and why the waste generation baseline was adopted:
---

Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Number of students resident on-site 0 0
Number of employees resident on-site 0 0
Number of other individuals resident on-site 0 0
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 40,219 37,230
Full-time equivalent of employees 6,555 7,320
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 165 101
Weighted campus users 34,956.75 33,336.75

Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total waste generated per weighted campus user 0.01 Metric tons 0.03 Metric tons

Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
75.07

Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator by recycling, composting, donating or re-selling, performance year:
15.62

Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
15.62

In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers Yes
Food Yes
Cooking oil No
Plant materials Yes
Animal bedding No
White goods (i.e. appliances) Yes
Electronics No
Laboratory equipment No
Furniture Yes
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste No
Scrap metal No
Pallets No
Tires Yes
Other (please specify below) No

A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:

Derived from all the actions we carry out on campus, "UAT Recolecta" arises, a university program that has the objective of freely collecting items that are harmful to the environment, in order to have a more sustainable campus. Some of the items that are collected in this program are: Paper, PET Plastics, Luminaires, Batteries, Ink and Toner Cartridges.


Materials intended for disposal but subsequently recovered and reused on campus, performance year:
---

Does the institution use single stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes

Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes

Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes

Average contamination rate for the institution’s recycling program:
---

A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
---

A brief description of the institution's waste-related behavior change initiatives:

Derived from all the actions we carry out on campus, "UAT Recolecta" arises, a university program that has the objective of freely collecting items that are harmful to the environment, in order to have a more sustainable campus. Some of the items that are collected in this program are: Paper, PET Plastics, Luminaires, Batteries, Ink and Toner Cartridges.


A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
---

A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
---

A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
---

A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
---

A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
---

A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
---

A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
---

A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

The reduction in the amount of waste generated was reduced due to the fact that the students and staff of the university carried out their activities through digital platforms.


The reduction in the amount of waste generated was reduced due to the fact that the students and staff of the university carried out their activities through digital platforms.

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.