| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 31.76 |
| Liaison | Bob Nash |
| Submission Date | Dec. 17, 2019 |
United World College-USA
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
4.08 / 5.00 |
Todd
Austin Special Assistant for Strategic Initiatives President's Office |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
235
Full-time equivalent of employees:
95
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
100
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
No formal data collection methods were needed. 100% of students live on campus, which is small in size, making walking the way students travel within the campus area.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
36
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
36 of the faculty members and staff live on campus (or in College housing). Of these, 34 primarily walk while on campus. One faculty member, who lives at the Agroecological Research Center, often drives his car to campus as does the faculty member who lives in College-owned housing in Las Vegas. Given a lack of public transportation and other modes of transport to campus, it is assumed the remaining 59 employees also use single occupancy vehicles.
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 0 | 64.20 |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | 0 | 2 |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 100 | 35.80 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 0 | --- |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | 0 | --- |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 0 | --- |
| Distance education / telecommute | 0 | --- |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.