Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 46.18 |
Liaison | Suzanne Wood |
Submission Date | April 3, 2020 |
Executive Letter | Download |
UMass Chan Medical School
IN-18: Pre-Submission Review
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Suzanne
Wood Sustainability & Energy Manager Facilities Managment |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Lisa Bjerke, Senior Program Manager of Change Managment, GreenerU
A brief description of the review process:
Reviewed all credits that the institution is pursuing, checking that
1) All required reporting fields, attachments, inventories, and URLs are included and consistent with credit criteria and time frames.
2) Reported figures are consistent across credits (e.g., between the Institutional Characteristics section and specific credits that require similar figures) and that any inconsistencies are explained.
Comments and recommended actions were provided to UMass Medical School
Which of the following describes the review process?:
Independent reviewer(s)
Affirmation from the reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template:
Optional Fields
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 2nd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 3rd reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 3rd reviewer:
---
Affirmation from a 4th reviewer that the submission has been reviewed in full and that any identified inconsistencies have been addressed:
---
Copy of the completed STARS Review Template for the 4th reviewer:
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.