Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 38.99 |
Liaison | Hayley Berliner |
Submission Date | Oct. 28, 2019 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Trinity College (CT)
EN-6: Assessing Sustainability Culture
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.25 / 1.00 |
Hayley
Berliner Sustainability Coordinator Finance & Operations |
Does the institution conduct an assessment of sustainability culture (i.e. the assessment focuses on sustainability values, behaviors and beliefs, and may also address awareness of campus sustainability initiatives)?:
Which of the following best describes the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered to::
Which of the following best describes the structure of the cultural assessment? The assessment is administered::
A brief description of how and when the cultural assessment(s) were developed and/or adopted:
By the Student Government Association Sustainability Committee during the fall of 2018.
A copy or sample of the questions related to sustainability culture:
A sample of the questions related to sustainability culture or the website URL where the assessment tool is available:
A brief description of how representative samples were reached (if applicable) and how the cultural assessment is administered:
The survey was sent around via email and through various clubs.
A brief summary of results from the cultural assessment, including a description of any measurable changes over time:
Students responded that they saw themselves as somewhat sustainable and that sustainability was important to them and that they believe Trinity is not a sustainable school. Students generally wanted to see food systems and recycling programs improved on campus. In addition, A lot of answers discussed increasing education so student-driven initiatives can be more successful, several people just wanted to emphasize how Trinity was bad at energy use, in addition to a request more water fountains.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.