Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 38.09 |
Liaison | Meghan Bennett |
Submission Date | May 14, 2013 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Towson University
OP-17: Waste Reduction
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.00 / 5.00 |
Clara
Fang Sustainability Manager Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Weight of materials recycled, 2005 baseline year :
767.30
Tons
None
Weight of materials composted, 2005 baseline year :
0
Tons
None
Weight of materials disposed as garbage, 2005 baseline year :
2,485.20
Tons
None
Weight of materials recycled, performance year :
1,102.19
Tons
None
Weight of materials composted, performance year :
102.84
Tons
None
Weight of materials disposed as garbage, performance year :
3,408
Tons
None
List the start and end dates of the waste reduction performance year:
Jan 1- Dec 31 2011
None
On-campus residents, 2005:
3,428
None
Non-residential/commuter full-time students, faculty, and staff members, 2005:
12,060
None
Non-residential/commuter part-time students, faculty, and staff members, 2005:
5,368
None
On-campus residents, performance year:
4,810
None
Non-residential/commuter full-time students, faculty, and staff members, performance year:
14,159
None
Non-residential/commuter part-time students, faculty, and staff members, performance year:
5,696
None
Time period for weighted campus user (list the consecutive 12 month period that most closely overlaps with waste reduction performance year):
January 1 - December 31, 2011
None
Indication of whether institution has a stated commitment to waste-reduction goals, such as zero waste:
No
None
A brief description of the plan of action to achieve waste reduction goals:
Below is a list of waste reduction strategies Towson already employs as well as strategies highlighted in the climate action plan that Towson can or should employ:
1. Improve the single stream recycling rate by enhancing education and outreach on recycling.
2. Continue to encourage and facilitate initiatives to reduce waste such as the “bagless” initiative in the University Store, the Reusable Mug and Bottle programs and going “trayless” in the food service facilities.
3. Continue to monitor, study and develop revisions to make the single-stream solid waste and recycling collection system on campus to be more user-friendly and effective.
4. Investigate the feasibility of implementing “move-out” and “move-in” waste reduction initiatives.
5. Require all campus construction projects to recycle construction and demolition wastes to the greatest extent practical.
6. Develop a plan for creating a composting area on campus.
7. Study the cost-benefit of eliminating some or all disposable bottles and cans on campus.
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s waste reduction initiatives is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.