| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 51.71 |
| Liaison | Anne Jakle |
| Submission Date | Oct. 18, 2024 |
The University of New Mexico
OP-4: Ecologically Managed Grounds
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.78 / 5.00 |
Anne
Jakle Director of Sustainability Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
4.1 Organic landscaping/grounds services
Yes
Online location of the institution’s IPM protocol:
---
Copy of the institution’s IPM protocol:
Do the institution’s landscaping/grounds services publish, on at least an annual basis, an inventory of the synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides used on campus grounds?:
No
Online location of the institution’s chemical inventory:
---
Copy of the institution’s most recent chemical inventory:
---
Do the institution’s landscaping/grounds services manage one or more sites or pilot projects without the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, fungicides, or herbicides?:
No
Narrative and/or website URL providing an overview of the institution’s organic landscaping/grounds policies and practices:
---
Have the institution’s landscaping/grounds services eliminated their use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides?:
No
Online resource affirming the organic status of the institution’s landscaping/grounds services:
---
Document affirming the organic status of the institution’s landscaping/grounds services:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
0.50
4.2 Ratio of ecologically managed green space to total managed green space
168.30
Hectares
Area protected or restored:
0
Hectares
Area of tree canopy:
23.30
Hectares
Area managed organically:
0
Hectares
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following four figures:
0
Ratio of tree canopy to total managed green space:
0.14
Ratio of areas managed organically to total managed green space:
0
Points earned for indicator OP 4.2:
0.28
Optional documentation
---
Additional documentation for this credit:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.