Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 51.50 |
Liaison | Mike Harrington |
Submission Date | Aug. 6, 2018 |
Executive Letter | Download |
The New School
OP-22: Water Use
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.52 / 5.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Level of ”Physical Risk QUANTITY” for the institution’s main campus as indicated by the World Resources Institute’s Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas:
Medium to High
Part 1
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water use | 152,254.57 Cubic meters | 158,835.64 Cubic meters |
Potable water use:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use | 152,254.57 Cubic meters | 158,835.64 Cubic meters |
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | July 1, 2016 | July 1, 2017 |
Baseline Year | July 1, 2014 | July 1, 2015 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
FY2015 was resolved to be a universal baseline for energy, water and waste infrormation. There are several reasons- first, while data exists prior to this period, an engineer was hired in FY2015 to manage data tracking, so the quality is known to be high. Second, this was the first year of publishing an annual sustainability report, which fully details this data, trends, and supporting projects.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users":
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 1,956 | 1,754 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 8 | 6 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 52 | 47 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 9,202 | 9,266 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 2,008 | 1,927 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 177 | 221 |
Weighted campus users | 8,817.75 | 8,716 |
Potable water use per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per weighted campus user | 17.27 Cubic meters | 18.22 Cubic meters |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per weighted campus user from baseline:
5.25
Part 2
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Gross floor area | 127,029.62 Gross square meters | 127,029.62 Gross square meters |
Potable water use per unit of floor area:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per unit of floor area | 1.20 Cubic meters per square meter | 1.25 Cubic meters per square meter |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area from baseline:
4.14
Part 3
No
Area of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Vegetated grounds | --- | --- |
Total water use (potable + non-potable) per unit of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water use per unit of vegetated grounds | --- | --- |
Percentage reduction in total water use per unit of vegetated grounds from baseline:
---
Optional Fields
Promoting increased awareness through outreach and standard literature distributed to studentsand and staff
A brief description of the institution's water recovery and reuse initiatives:
Largest building on campus (365k.sq.ft./1.4M) has a blackwater and greywater recycling plant, in addition to a green roof and rainwater holding tank. Mechanical system metering is underway to better track and detect leaks in mechanical equipment.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems with water-efficient alternatives (e.g. building retrofits):
We are upgrading water fixtures (faucets, water closets, etc.) with low-flow water-sense models. We have completed three upgrade projects in large buildings (making up around 250k.sq.ft.) during the past two years, includin a dormitory. There are general plans to continue these retrofits throughout the remaining campus.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.