| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66.80 |
| Liaison | Martín Sánchez Gutiérrez |
| Submission Date | June 7, 2024 |
Tecnológico de Monterrey – Campus Monterrey
OP-9: Landscape Management
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.74 / 2.00 |
Total campus area:
Figures required to calculate the total area of managed grounds:
| Area (double-counting is not allowed) | |
| Area managed organically, without the use of inorganic fertilizers and chemical pesticides, fungicides and herbicides | 0 Acres |
| Area managed in accordance with an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program that uses selected chemicals only when needed | 165.30 Acres |
| Area managed using conventional, chemical-based landscape management practices | 59.40 Acres |
| Total area of managed grounds | 224.70 Acres |
If the total area of managed grounds is less than the total campus area, provide:
Organic program
If reporting an organic program, provide:
There is no exclusive organic management area, however they are beginning to be implemented (Compost) and Humitron (Fertilizer)
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program
If reporting an IPM program, provide:
A brief description of the IPM program:
Campus Monterrey uses traditional chemicals in its green areas only when necessary. The comprehensive green area management program seeks to use citric-acid based chemicals in most cases. The comprehensive plan seeks to primarily impact denge mosquitoes and fruit flies, common plague on the region and weather. Attached is the list of products used on Campus everyday.
Optional Fields
A brief description of the institution's approach to hydrology and water use:
A brief description of the institution's approach to landscape materials management and waste minimization:
A brief description of the institution's approach to energy-efficient landscape design:
A brief description of other sustainable landscape management practices employed by the institution:
Website URL where information about the institution’s sustainable landscape management program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.