Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 46.23
Liaison Martín Sánchez Gutiérrez
Submission Date June 29, 2024

STARS v3.0

Tecnológico de Monterrey – Campus Chihuahua
PA-3: Institutional Governance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 4.00
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

3.1 Student participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which students can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which students can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
"FETEC" is the Student Association of Tec de Monterrey and the official goverment body for all students in Campus. Each Campus has their own "FETEC", and one of their main objectives is to be a platform for the students initiatives and representation in decision making for their well-being and everyday experiences.
FETEC has eight work areas
  • Operations 
  • identity and inclusion
  • Communication
  • Student Life
  • Citizen representation
  • Outreach Impact
  • Student Council
  • Financial Support

http://www.ccm.itesm.mx/life/fetec.html


Are one or more student representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining student representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---

Does at least one student representative have voting rights on the highest decision-making body?:
No

Description of other mechanisms used to consult students on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.1:
0.50

3.2 Academic staff participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
---

Are one or more academic staff representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---

Does at least one academic staff representative have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Description of other mechanisms used to consult academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.2:
0

3.3 Non-academic staff participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which non-academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which non-academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
The supreme governing body of Tec de Monterrey is the Assembly of Associates, which is composed of leaders from different communities in Mexico, as well as professors and collaborators of the institution. Its responsibility is to safeguard the vision and values of Tecnológico de Monterrey and contribute to the establishment and fulfillment of its strategy, as well as the management of its resources and talent.
 
From the members of the Assembly of Associates, a Board of Directors is appointed, tasked with ensuring the proper operation and functioning of the institution. This work is supported by a series of Councils and Committees.
 
Additionally, the Board of Directors of Tec de Monterrey is supported by Auxiliary Councils and Committees, Subcommittees, Advisory Councils, and Campus Councils. All governing bodies of Tecnológico de Monterrey have a Secretary, who are collaborators of the institution.
 

Are one or more staff members representing non-managerial workers included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining non-academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---

Does at least one staff member representing non-managerial workers have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Description of other mechanisms used to consult non-academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.3:
0.50

3.4 Community participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which local community-based organizations not affiliated with the institution can democratically participate in its governance?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which local community-based organizations can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
---

Has the institution used one or more ad hoc mechanisms during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ad hoc mechanisms used during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.4:
0

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:
---

Additional documentation for this credit:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.