Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 46.23 |
Liaison | Martín Sánchez Gutiérrez |
Submission Date | June 29, 2024 |
Tecnológico de Monterrey – Campus Chihuahua
OP-9: Sustainable Procurement System
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.10 / 7.00 |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution have a published code of conduct to guide suppliers on the institution’s social and environmental expectations for them?:
Yes
Copy of the institution’s supplier code of conduct:
Online location of the institution’s supplier code of conduct:
---
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to environmental impact that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
Yes
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to the treatment of workers that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
No
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to governance and ethical business practices that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
No
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to the advancement of sustainability in the supply chain?:
Yes
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations of monitoring and review?:
Yes
Points earned for indicator OP 9.1:
0.60
Does the institution have sufficient data on its bid solicitations to pursue this indicator?:
No
Percentage of bid solicitations that identify product sustainability specifications:
---
Percentage of bid solicitations that identify supplier sustainability considerations:
---
Description of the methodology used to assess the institution’s bid solicitations:
---
Online resource supporting the percentage of bid solicitations reported:
---
Document supporting the percentage of bid solicitations reported:
---
Points earned for indicator OP 9.2:
0
Average weight assigned to product sustainability specifications in the institution’s bid appraisal process:
1 to 4 percent
Average weight assigned to supplier sustainability considerations in the institution’s bid appraisal process:
1 to 4 percent
Narrative outlining how the average weights given to sustainability considerations were determined:
Since late 2022, all bids and purchases made withe the internal Coupa system must comply with a sustainability analysis. The catalog also features a "Sustainability" Category with validated options for every day products.
Points earned for indicator OP 9.3:
0.50
Does the institution have sufficient data on its contract spend to pursue this indicator?:
No
Performance year for contract spend:
---
Local currency code:
---
Total annual contract spend:
---
Annual contract spend with social impact suppliers:
---
Narrative and/or website URL providing an a overview of the institution’s contracts with social impact suppliers:
---
Description of the methodology used to assess the institution’s contract spend with social impact suppliers:
---
Percentage of contract spend with social impact suppliers:
---
Points earned for indicator 9.4:
---
Notes about the information provided for this credit:
---
Additional documentation for this credit:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.