Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 66.09 |
Liaison | Elizabeth Drake |
Submission Date | March 3, 2023 |
Swarthmore College
OP-5: Building Energy Efficiency
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
![]() |
4.23 / 6.00 |
Hannah
Ulloa Climate Action Manager Office of Sustainability |
Electricity use, performance year (report kilowatt-hours):
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 16,915,294 Kilowatt-hours | 57,714.98 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 56,940 Kilowatt-hours | 194.28 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, performance year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 85,236 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, performance year:
Gross floor area of building space, performance year:
Floor area of energy intensive space, performance year:
Floor area | |
Laboratory space | 92,331 Square Feet |
Healthcare space | 4,291 Square Feet |
Other energy intensive space | 9,159 Square Feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Degree days, performance year:
Degree days | |
Heating degree days | 3,800 Degree-Days (°F) |
Cooling degree days | 1,310 Degree-Days (°F) |
Total degree days, performance year:
Start and end dates of the performance year (or 3-year period):
Start date | End date | |
Performance period | July 1, 2020 | June 30, 2021 |
Total site energy consumption per unit of EUI-adjusted floor area per degree day, performance year:
Electricity use, baseline year (report kWh):
kWh | MMBtu | |
Imported electricity | 17,142,606 Kilowatt-hours | 58,490.57 MMBtu |
Electricity from on-site, non-combustion facilities/devices (e.g., renewable energy systems) | 0 Kilowatt-hours | 0 MMBtu |
Stationary fuels and thermal energy, baseline year (report MMBtu):
MMBtu | |
Stationary fuels used on-site to generate electricity and/or thermal energy | 103,339 MMBtu |
Imported steam, hot water, and/or chilled water | 0 MMBtu |
Total site energy consumption, baseline year:
Gross floor area of building space, baseline year:
Start and end dates of the baseline year (or 3-year period):
Start date | End date | |
Baseline period | Jan. 1, 2005 | Dec. 31, 2005 |
A brief description of when and why the energy consumption baseline was adopted:
2005 was our peak year for energy consumption after a decade of growth.
Source-site ratio for imported electricity:
Total energy consumption per unit of floor area:
Site energy | Source energy | |
Performance year | 0.08 MMBtu / GSF | 0.14 MMBtu / GSF |
Baseline year | 0.11 MMBtu / GSF | 0.19 MMBtu / GSF |
Percentage reduction in total source energy consumption per unit of floor area from baseline:
Documentation to support the performance year energy consumption figures reported above:
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices in regard to energy efficiency:
There is signage around campus that encourages individuals to turn lights off after they leave a room. There are also campus-wide emails that remind students who live on campus to unplug all electronic devices and turn off all lights when leaving for extended breaks.
A brief description of energy use standards and controls employed by the institution:
Energy management practices include use of an extensive Siemens BMS to implement nighttime setbacks, room scheduling, and temporary heating/cooling options to allow partial use over breaks or off-peak times. Lighting sensors are also employed in a wide variety of campus spaces.
A brief description of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting and other energy-efficient lighting strategies employed by the institution:
All new lighting is specified to be LED unless impractical or special purpose. Past and recent projects include the retrofit of various Athletics facilities and the Science Center to switch incandescents into LED light fixtures.
A brief description of passive solar heating, geothermal systems, and related strategies employed by the institution:
The PPR Apartments is connected to a geothermal energy system. Singer Hall, another new academic building, was built with Passive Design & Envelope Optimization, which combine to put less demand on the HVAC systems and retaining conditioned air through leak prevention and increased insulation. Additionally, the College has begun work to transition all heating and cooling on campus to a geoexchange system. Mention geoexchange system for Whittier hall, working on transitioning enetire system to geoexchange.
A brief description of co-generation employed by the institution:
None.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace energy-consuming appliances, equipment, and systems with high efficiency alternatives:
Website URL where information about the institution’s energy conservation and efficiency program is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Imported electricity number includes buildings off the main campus (101 S. Chester) & separately metered buildings.
This data was assembled by Jim Adams, Director of Sustainable Maintenance, Domenic Porrini, Asst. Director for Sustainable Energy Services, and Hannah Ulloa, Climate Action Manager.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.