Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 33.31 |
Liaison | Katherine Straub |
Submission Date | Feb. 21, 2018 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Susquehanna University
OP-19: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.85 / 8.00 |
Katherine
Straub Professor Earth and Environmental Sciences |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2: Waste Minimization
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 29 Tons | 74 Tons |
Materials composted | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 666 Tons | 690 Tons |
Total waste generated | 695 Tons | 764 Tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
---
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | July 1, 2016 | June 30, 2017 |
Baseline Year | July 1, 2012 | June 30, 2013 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
Chose 2013 as the baseline year to be consistent with the GHG inventory baseline.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 2,001 | 1,782 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 16 | 16 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 2,149.60 | 2,168 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 436 | 439 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 0 | 0 |
Weighted campus users | 2,443.45 | 2,404.75 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.28 Tons | 0.32 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
10.47
Part 3: Waste Diversion
4.17
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
4.17
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | Yes |
Cooking oil | Yes |
Plant materials | Yes |
Animal bedding | No |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | Yes |
Laboratory equipment | Yes |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | Yes |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | Yes |
Tires | Yes |
Other (please specify below) | Yes |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
Batteries, fluorescent and other light bulbs/lamps
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
---
Recycling Management
No
Does the institution use dual stream (two separate containers for recyclables, e.g. one for paper and another for plastic, glass, and metals) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
No
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling (multiple containers that further separate different types of materials) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
Yes
Contamination and Discard Rates
---
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed, e.g. efforts to minimize contamination and/or monitor the discard rates of the materials recovery facilities and mills to which materials are diverted:
---
Programs and Initiatives
---
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
---
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste (e.g. by minimizing packaging and purchasing in bulk):
---
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
---
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse (e.g. of electronics, furnishings, books and other goods):
Information Technology holds a "yard sale" each year to sell surplus IT equipment to campus community members.
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption (e.g. restricting free printing and/or mandating doubled-sided printing in libraries and computer labs):
All students are allotted $30 per semester for printing and copying. They are charged the same rates as faculty and administrators - $0.06 B&W, $0.10 Color. If they go over their allotment, the Bursar will invoice for printing/copying charges.
By default, printing is set for duplex 2-sided and black and white. Single sided and color are available but must be selected at the time of printing.
Faculty can request additional university allotted pages for particular classes.
All student printing requests are stored for 24 hours. If the print job is not actually released and printed, the print job will be deleted from the print queue.
University wide, no printing on the Multifunction Printers takes place without a charge code, resulting in all print charges being allocated to one of the university’s department budgets.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials (e.g. course catalogs, course schedules, and directories) available online by default rather than printing them:
Faculty meeting agendas and minutes are distributed electronically. Updated Faculty Handbooks are printed only by request. Course catalogs are printed only by request.
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
Information Technology designates areas during move-out for students to leave unwanted electronics.
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Landfill waste includes both Facilities (campus) and Aramark (Dining Services)
FY 2017:
Facilities 320 tons
Aramark 337 tons Evert + 9 tons Ele's
Total = 666 tons
FY 2013:
Facilities 344 tons
Aramark 337 tons Evert + 9 tons Ele's
Total = 690 tons
Evert weights calculated based on EPA 2016 volume to weight conversion of 463 lbs per cubic yard for food waste; Evert dumpster is 6 cubic yards and has 243 pickups/year = 337.5 tons per year
Ele's (Natural Science Center cafe) weights calculated on EPA 2016 volume to weight conversion of 73 lbs per cubic yard for commercial municipal solid waste dry waste (high end estimate) since mostly plates, cups, etc.; Ele's dumpster is 4 cubic yards and has 64 pickups/year = 9.3 tons per year
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.