| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50.14 |
| Liaison | Jessa Gagne |
| Submission Date | April 22, 2016 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Stonehill College
PA-5: Assessing Diversity and Equity
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Liza
Talusan Director of Intercultural Affairs Intercultural Affairs |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Has the institution assessed diversity and equity in terms of campus climate?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the campus climate assessment(s) :
We have completed a few in-house campus climate assessments, with the most recent informing the work of the Presidential Diversity Task Force. This document, as a result of the campus climate survey, has driven institutional planning and diversity related initiatives.
None
Has the institution assessed student diversity and educational equity?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the student diversity and educational equity assessment(s):
We have addressed student diversity but have not fully addressed educational equity. In a number of ways, we have looked at both numerical representation and also campus climate and sense of belonging within the student population.
None
Has the institution assessed employee diversity and employment equity?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the employee diversity and employment equity assessment(s):
Approximately two years ago, Stonehill added features within the application process to better track racial and ethnic diversity. However, there has not been a formal climate survey of faculty or staff of color, primarily because the sample size is too small to address anonymity and protection of identity in responses. Within the Diversity Task Force Plan, there are many layers of steps to address employee diversity, however these have yet to be fully implemented since the plan launched in 2013.
None
Has the institution assessed diversity and equity in terms of governance and public engagement?:
Yes
None
A brief description of the governance and public engagement assessment(s):
This was done through a class project, however the results were not favorable to Stonehill. The results revealed that people at Stonehill held deep-rooted stereotypes about our local neighboring community that were impacted by race and class. However, because of this assessment, a number of different strategies and changes have been made to reduce bias and stereotyping and privilege the assets of the community.
None
The website URL where information about the assessment(s) is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.