| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66.99 |
| Liaison | Olivia Conner-Bennett |
| Submission Date | Aug. 31, 2023 |
Stevens Institute of Technology
PA-13: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Sheraine
Gilliam VP of Human Resources Human Resources |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees assessed, directly or by representative sample:
100
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
Stevens engaged with Great Places to Work to conduct a workplace culture survey. The survey was offered to all Stevens employees. There was a 40% response rate. They calculated the response rate based on the number of employees the survey was sent to and the number of employees that responded. 85% of a company’s score is based on Trust and Maximizing Human Potential and 15% is based on Leadership Effectiveness, Innovation by All and Value.
More information about Great Places to Work and its methodology may be found here: https://www.greatplacetowork.com/solutions/employee-surveys
More information about Great Places to Work and its methodology may be found here: https://www.greatplacetowork.com/solutions/employee-surveys
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation:
Stevens has a cloud-hosted reporting platform that provides powerful insights into results to uncover experience gaps. We have a dedicated Great Place to Work culture coach that helps make sense of survey results and provides key levers to pull in order to elevate strengths and close gaps. The culture coach will present results to leadership and HR will help address division gaps and devise mitigation strategy across all units.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgcfWZKzI8M
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.