Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 78.28 |
Liaison | Hannah Rushing |
Submission Date | Jan. 26, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Sterling College (VT)
OP-19: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.67 / 8.00 |
Kelly
Jones Manager Buildings and Grounds |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2: Waste Minimization
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 13.34 Tons | 13.20 Tons |
Materials composted | 0.70 Tons | 0.80 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 5 Tons | 5 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 46.76 Tons | 45.40 Tons |
Total waste generated | 65.80 Tons | 64.40 Tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
---
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | July 1, 2015 | June 30, 2016 |
Baseline Year | July 1, 2013 | June 30, 2014 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
We started tracking waste for FY14 as part of our first AASHE survey.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 120 | 93 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 5 | 5 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 120 | 109 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 45 | 45 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 0 | 0 |
Weighted campus users | 155 | 140 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.42 Tons | 0.46 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
7.71
Part 3: Waste Diversion
28.93
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
28.93
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | Yes |
Cooking oil | No |
Plant materials | Yes |
Animal bedding | Yes |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | No |
Laboratory equipment | Yes |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | Yes |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | Yes |
Tires | No |
Other (please specify below) | No |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
---
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
---
Recycling Management
Yes
Does the institution use dual stream (two separate containers for recyclables, e.g. one for paper and another for plastic, glass, and metals) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
No
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling (multiple containers that further separate different types of materials) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
No
Contamination and Discard Rates
0
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed, e.g. efforts to minimize contamination and/or monitor the discard rates of the materials recovery facilities and mills to which materials are diverted:
---
Programs and Initiatives
---
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
---
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste (e.g. by minimizing packaging and purchasing in bulk):
---
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
We have a central office supply closet on campus. Community members are invited to bring in their surplus or no longer needed office supplies so that others may use them.
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse (e.g. of electronics, furnishings, books and other goods):
We have Free Boxes all throughout campus. Additionally, the Brown Library has a Book Exchange series of shelves for community members to exchange books.
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption (e.g. restricting free printing and/or mandating doubled-sided printing in libraries and computer labs):
All of our printers are default set to use double-sided printing.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials (e.g. course catalogs, course schedules, and directories) available online by default rather than printing them:
Our website employs an intranet for students and faculty/staff that puts as much information online as possible. Additionally, we are turning as many forms into online forms as we can. Our course catalog is completely digital, and has been for some years now. We are sharing as many documents using the intranet and Google docs as possible. All of our course schedules are online via the website or via Google docs.
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
We have a free box in every dorm and in the main student center. Students are encouraged to "shop" the free box. We also encourage sharing outdoor supplies such as gear for Expedition, tents, and skis.
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
The Sterling College community reuses as much as possible. That can mean anything from having free boxes in every dorm for re-use of clothing to recycling shingles during renovations. Everything is scrutinized to wring as much use from items as possible.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.