Overall Rating | Platinum - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 85.66 |
Liaison | Mark Lichtenstein |
Submission Date | March 5, 2021 |
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.81 / 3.00 |
Brenda
Greenfield Director of Development Development Office |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
45,536,220
US/Canadian $
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 511,394.55 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 40,000 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
- Total investment includes $45M in stocks and bonds with Vanguard
- ESF’s College Foundation invests 1% of the portfolio in the Vanguard FTSE Social Index mutual fund. This is a socially responsible mutual fund that is managed by Vanguard. This low-cost fund seeks to track a benchmark of large- and mid-capitalization stocks that have been screened for certain social, human rights, and environmental criteria.
- ESF’s College Foundation invests 1% of the portfolio in the Vanguard FTSE Social Index mutual fund. This is a socially responsible mutual fund that is managed by Vanguard. This low-cost fund seeks to track a benchmark of large- and mid-capitalization stocks that have been screened for certain social, human rights, and environmental criteria.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
1.21
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
Yes
None
A copy of the sustainable investment policy:
None
The sustainable investment policy:
see pdf
None
Does the institution use its sustainable investment policy to select and guide investment managers?:
Yes
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
The policy is annually reviewed by Foundation Finance and Investment Committee. Updates provided to investment manager to guide investment decisions.
Proxy voting
No
None
A copy of the proxy voting guidelines or proxy record:
---
None
A brief description of how managers are adhering to proxy voting guidelines:
---
Shareholder resolutions
No
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
---
Divestment efforts and negative screens
Yes
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
No direct investments in fossil fuels (included in policy statement).
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
100
Investor networks
No
None
A brief description of the investor networks and/or collaborations:
---
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.