Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 52.66 |
Liaison | Grace Afflerbach |
Submission Date | March 8, 2024 |
Purchase College - State University of New York
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.36 / 3.00 |
Grace
Afflerbach Sustainability Coordinator Facilities |
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 1,954,628 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
The value for "Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens" represent Private Equity including the managers Martin Currie. Martin Currie is a separately managed account focused on Global Emerging Market equities. Martin Currie uses bottom-up, fundamental research with ESG integration to identify high quality emerging market companies with robust balance sheets and growth potential that they believe are attractive. ESG factors are embedded in the investment process and engagement is viewed as an essential element of their analysis.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
Proxy voting
Shareholder resolutions
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
N/A
Divestment efforts and negative screens
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
Investor networks
The Foundation participates in best practices conversations with SUNY peer institutions as well as participating in CASE and AGB conferences where best practices are discussed.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.