Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 49.37
Liaison Beth Klein
Submission Date Feb. 5, 2025

STARS v3.0

State University of New York at Cortland
OP-9: Sustainable Procurement System

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.60 / 7.00 Megan Swing
Energy and Sustainability Engagement Coordinator
Sustainability Office
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

9.1 Supplier code of conduct

Does the institution have a published code of conduct to guide suppliers on the institution’s social and environmental expectations for them?:
Yes

Copy of the institution’s supplier code of conduct:
---

Online location of the institution’s supplier code of conduct:
Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to environmental impact that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
Yes

Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to the treatment of workers that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
Yes

Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to governance and ethical business practices that exceed or are additional to regulatory compliance?:
Yes

Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations in regard to the advancement of sustainability in the supply chain?:
No

Does the institution’s supplier code of conduct include one or more expectations of monitoring and review?:
No

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator OP 9.1:
0.60

9.2 Percentage of bid solicitations that identify sustainability considerations

Does the institution have sufficient data on its bid solicitations to pursue this indicator?:
No

Percentage of bid solicitations that identify product sustainability specifications:
---

Percentage of bid solicitations that identify supplier sustainability considerations:
---

Description of the methodology used to assess the institution’s bid solicitations:
---

If claiming points for this indicator, at least one of the following two fields is also required:

Online resource supporting the percentage of bid solicitations reported:
---

Document supporting the percentage of bid solicitations reported:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator OP 9.2:
0

9.3 Average weight given to sustainability considerations in bid appraisal 

Average weight assigned to product sustainability specifications in the institution’s bid appraisal process:
Data not available

Average weight assigned to supplier sustainability considerations in the institution’s bid appraisal process:
Data not available

Narrative outlining how the average weights given to sustainability considerations were determined:

n/a


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator OP 9.3:
0

9.4 Percentage of contract spend with social impact suppliers

Does the institution have sufficient data on its contract spend to pursue this indicator?:
Yes

Performance year for contract spend:
2024

Local currency code:
USD

Total annual contract spend:
12,035,043.98

Annual contract spend with social impact suppliers:
630,213.66

Narrative and/or website URL providing an a overview of the institution’s contracts with social impact suppliers:
Description of the methodology used to assess the institution’s contract spend with social impact suppliers:

For total contract spend, a report was ran through Business Intelligence for vouchers paid between 7/1/23 and 6/30/2024, exported to Excel, and filtered out POs.

For MWBE contract spend, a report was run in the New York State Contract System for MWBE spending and narrowed down to our campus, and manually added payments to MWBE primes and subs. This does NOT include MWBE spend for purchase orders.


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following two figures:

Percentage of contract spend with social impact suppliers:
5.24

Points earned for indicator 9.4:
1

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:

New York State Procurement Guidelines, September 2023 - The guidelines state, “As noted, State Agencies undertake procurements to address a wide range of needs. Before proceeding, the Agency should confirm that there is not a pre-existing contract that Page 8 of 49 will meet its needs. To meet varying needs and form, function, and utility requirements, an Agency must first identify its specific needs, estimate costs, perform market research, consider relevant State requirements and goals (e.g., recycled content, GreenNY specifications), and then follow the order of priority set forth below (State Finance Law § 163(3) & (4)).” 

Green NY Approved Specifications Under GreenNY and Executive Order 22, New York state agencies, including SUNY Cortland,  are required to purchase commodities, services and technology that meet approved green procurement specifications.  

Green Purchasing Products and Sources This webpage contains Preferred Sources and OGS Centralized Contracts which contain environmentally friendly preferable offerings, some but not all meet New York State’s EO 22 Green NY specifications, which SUNY Cortland must follow.  

Executive Order 22 – Executive Order highlighting sustainable goals to accelerate New York’s tranistion to a green economy through which State agencies, including SUNY Cortland, are ensured to follow best practices in green purchasing with new green purchasing specifications and operational directives.  


Additional documentation for this credit:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.