Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 81.02 |
Liaison | Sam Lubow |
Submission Date | June 29, 2016 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Stanford University
OP-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
6.00 / 10.00 |
Moira
Hafer Sustainability Specialist Office of Sustainability |
Has the institution conducted a GHG emissions inventory that includes all Scope 1 and 2 emissions? :
Does the institution’s GHG emissions inventory include all, some or none of its Scope 3 GHG emissions from the following categories?:
All, Some, or None | |
Business travel | Some |
Commuting | All |
Purchased goods and services | None |
Capital goods | None |
Waste generated in operations | None |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | None |
Other categories | None |
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory, including how the institution accounted for each category of Scope 3 emissions reported above:
In 2001, the State of California created the nonprofit California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) to facilitate the voluntary accounting and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions within the state. CCAR stopped collecting emissions inventories in 2010 and transitioned its membership to the Climate Registry (TCR), a nonprofit emissions registry for North America.
The CCAR General Reporting Protocol required filing of Scope I & II emissions with independent third party verification, and encouraged participants to file inventories of Scope III emissions as well. Stanford joined the CCAR in 2006 and used this protocol to prepare and file its GHG emission inventories through 2009. In 2010, Stanford transitioned to TCR protocol for its third-party verified emissions inventory, and it has reported through TCR in each subsequent year to date.
Scope III emissions at this time (business air travel and driving commuters) are compiled internally by Stanford's Parking & Transportation Services and are not formally verified.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
A brief description of the internal and/or external verification process:
Stanford verifies its emissions inventory every year through an independent third party, as required by TCR's protocol.
Please see the following website for more details on the required verification protocol: http://www.theclimateregistry.org/resources/verification/general-verification-protocol/
Documentation to support the internal and/or external verification process:
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 and Part 3 of this credit? (reductions in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions):
Gross Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion | 20,709.38 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 10,713 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources | 9,447.95 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 5,231 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity | 81,070.11 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 74,394 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from other sources | 18,075.70 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 92,554 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total | 129,303.14 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 182,892 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | Jan. 1, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2015 |
Baseline Year | Jan. 1, 2007 | Dec. 31, 2007 |
A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted (e.g. in sustainability plans and policies or in the context of other reporting obligations):
Although Stanford University first reported its GHG emissions in 2006, the 2007 results provide a more accurate baseline for the university. Reporting in 2006 included a number of non-typical operations, including major maintenance operations at the Central Energy Facility. Therefore, 2006 results are not considered representative of actual campus emissions.
Figures needed to determine total carbon offsets:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased (exclude purchased RECs/GOs) | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon sequestration due to land that the institution manages specifically for sequestration | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from on-site composting | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon offsets included above for which the emissions reductions have been sold or transferred by the institution | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Net carbon offsets | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
A brief description of the offsets in each category reported above, including vendor, project source, verification program and contract timeframes (as applicable):
Emissions reductions attributable to Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) or Guarantee of Origin (GO) purchases:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Emissions reductions attributable to REC/GO purchases | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
A brief description of the purchased RECs/GOs including vendor, project source and verification program:
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions | 129,303.14 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 182,892 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Figures needed to determine “Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 11,402 | 10,305 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 0 | 0 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 15,887 | 13,282 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 12,879 | 11,027 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 0 | 0 |
Weighted campus users | 24,425 | 20,808 |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user | 5.29 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 8.79 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
Gross floor area of building space, performance year:
Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor Area | |
Laboratory space | 1,800,941 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 0 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 101,716 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per unit of EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
Emissions | |
Business travel | 22,333 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | 25,702 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other categories | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives, including efforts made during the previous three years:
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
In 2015, Stanford began including all greenhouse gases in its emissions inventory, rather than just carbon dioxide. While Stanford has achieved significant emissions reductions in 2015 due to its new energy system (detailed below) and other efficiency efforts, the inclusion of these additional greenhouse gases has increased this year's overall emissions by approximately 5.2%. The numbers reported in this credit for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, which include these additional gases, is not necessarily an apples to apples comparison to the baseline year, which only includes carbon dioxide, but Stanford chose to include this slightly larger number in order to be consistent with the 2015 figure that the university will publicly report through TCR.
Please note that the GSF reported for the GHG inventory varies from the campus GSF reported for all other credits. The boundary of the GHG inventory is slightly different from the overall STARS boundary, and the GSF for the GHG inventory boundary is used for this credit. The difference primarily derives from the inclusion of off-campus leased spaces in the GHG inventory boundary. Changes in the way that Scope 3 emissions are calculated for business travel and commuters have decreased the emissions reported in those categories as compared to years past. The commuter emissions should now be more accurate, as the new calculation methodology takes into account the exact distance between the commuter's home and Stanford's campus, rather than using a self-reported distance. On the other hand, changes to the Procurement system in 2015 caused the business travel emissions report to exclude some sources, but this omission has now been remedied for future years.
The Stanford Energy System Innovations (SESI) project came online in April 2015 and will reduce campus greenhouse gas emissions by 68% by the end of 2016 through utilization of electric heat recovery technology at Stanford’s new Central Energy Facility combined with an agreement to build 78.5 MW of solar PV, 5.5 MW of which will be installed on campus. The data used in this credit represents nine months of the new energy system being online but does not capture any of the renewables that Stanford is currently introducing into its electricity portfolio through this project, so Stanford's emissions will continue to decrease as a result of this project throughout the coming years.
In 2015, Stanford began including all greenhouse gases in its emissions inventory, rather than just carbon dioxide. While Stanford has achieved significant emissions reductions in 2015 due to its new energy system (detailed below) and other efficiency efforts, the inclusion of these additional greenhouse gases has increased this year's overall emissions by approximately 5.2%. The numbers reported in this credit for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, which include these additional gases, is not necessarily an apples to apples comparison to the baseline year, which only includes carbon dioxide, but Stanford chose to include this slightly larger number in order to be consistent with the 2015 figure that the university will publicly report through TCR.
Please note that the GSF reported for the GHG inventory varies from the campus GSF reported for all other credits. The boundary of the GHG inventory is slightly different from the overall STARS boundary, and the GSF for the GHG inventory boundary is used for this credit. The difference primarily derives from the inclusion of off-campus leased spaces in the GHG inventory boundary. Changes in the way that Scope 3 emissions are calculated for business travel and commuters have decreased the emissions reported in those categories as compared to years past. The commuter emissions should now be more accurate, as the new calculation methodology takes into account the exact distance between the commuter's home and Stanford's campus, rather than using a self-reported distance. On the other hand, changes to the Procurement system in 2015 caused the business travel emissions report to exclude some sources, but this omission has now been remedied for future years.
The Stanford Energy System Innovations (SESI) project came online in April 2015 and will reduce campus greenhouse gas emissions by 68% by the end of 2016 through utilization of electric heat recovery technology at Stanford’s new Central Energy Facility combined with an agreement to build 78.5 MW of solar PV, 5.5 MW of which will be installed on campus. The data used in this credit represents nine months of the new energy system being online but does not capture any of the renewables that Stanford is currently introducing into its electricity portfolio through this project, so Stanford's emissions will continue to decrease as a result of this project throughout the coming years.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.