| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 43.28 |
| Liaison | Adam Maurer |
| Submission Date | Dec. 18, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
South Seattle College
PA-12: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Adam
Maurer District Sustainability Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample (0-100):
100
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
An employee satisfaction evaluation is administered every other year. It covers mission & goals, resources, instructional environment, educational support services, work environment, student focus, physical environmental, and faculty and staff support. Additional questions related to accreditation are also included in the survey.
All employees are covered by the evaluation.
Questions can be directed to Marsha Brown at South Seattle Community College.
206-934-5136.
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
Percentages of satisfied and dissatisfied are compared to results from previous years and a structured time is set up to share results with faculty and staff. A report is created and shared with all faculty and staff, the President's cabinet, the institutional effectiveness committee and the college council. The President's Cabinet and Institutional Effectiveness Committee meet once a year to discuss and plan institutional changes as part of strategic planning, and in years when a employee satisfaction evaluation is conducted this report is included in the scope of what is discussed and planned for the next strategic plan cycle, responding to specific issues that arise during the employee satisfaction evaluation.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.