Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 50.52 |
Liaison | Alicia Hodenfield |
Submission Date | Feb. 18, 2021 |
Sonoma State University
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.00 / 5.00 |
Rinika
Pulupudi Sustainability Analyst Facilities |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
8,671
Full-time equivalent of employees:
1,157.80
Part 1. Student commute modal split
No
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
37.60
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
The total percentage presented below is estimated from the Full time equivalent students and the number of student residents on-site. All the on-site residents either walk or bicycle to their classes while it is estimated that only a small percentage of off-campus students use public transportation such as Buses or Smart Trains.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
No
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
2.60
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
The total percentage presented below is estimated from total number of employees and the number of employee residents on-site. All the on-site residents either walk or bicycle for work while it is estimated that only a small percentage of employees use public transportation such as Buses or Smart Trains to commute.
Optional Fields
Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
Single-occupancy vehicle | 62.40 | 97.40 |
Zero-emissions vehicle | 0 | 0 |
Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 35.80 | 1 |
Vanpool or carpool | 0.40 | 0.50 |
Public transport or campus shuttle | 1 | 1 |
Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 0.40 | 0.10 |
Distance education / telecommute | 0 | 0 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.