Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 65.64
Liaison Rachael Wein
Submission Date March 3, 2017
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

Smith College
OP-22: Water Use

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.08 / 5.00 Bob Dombkowski
Supervisor- Grounds Section
Facilities
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Level of ”Physical Risk QUANTITY” for the institution’s main campus as indicated by the World Resources Institute’s Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas:
Medium to High

Total water use (potable and non-potable combined):
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total water use --- 54,968,434 Gallons

Potable water use:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Potable water use 47,992,020 Gallons 54,938,435 Gallons

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date End Date
Performance Year July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016
Baseline Year June 1, 2005 June 9, 2006

A brief description of when and why the water use baseline was adopted:

Oldest accurate data available


Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users":
Performance Year Baseline Year
Number of students resident on-site 2,874 2,400
Number of employees resident on-site 6 6
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds 0 0
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 2,804 2,748
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) 1,137.33 1,128
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 0 0
Weighted campus users 3,676.00 3,508.50

Potable water use per weighted campus user:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Potable water use per weighted campus user 13,055.51 Gallons 15,658.67 Gallons

Percentage reduction in potable water use per weighted campus user from baseline:
16.62

Gross floor area of building space:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Gross floor area 2,847,347 Gross square feet 2,775,997 Gross square feet

Potable water use per unit of floor area:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Potable water use per unit of floor area 16.85 Gallons per square foot 19.79 Gallons per square foot

Percentage reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area from baseline:
14.83

Does the institution wish to pursue Part 3 of this credit? (reductions in total water use per acre/hectare of vegetated grounds):
Yes

Area of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Vegetated grounds 90 Acres 90 Acres

Total water use (potable + non-potable) per unit of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total water use per unit of vegetated grounds 0 Gallons per acre 610,760.38 Gallons per acre

Percentage reduction in total water use per unit of vegetated grounds from baseline:
---

A brief description of the institution's water-related behavior change initiatives, e.g. initiatives to shift individual attitudes and practices such as signage and competitions:

Each year the house Eco-Reps hold April Showers, which is a water-saving competition held during Earth Week in April. Eco-Reps distribute 5 minute shower timers and challenge students to limit their showers to only 5 minutes, and to re-think if they need a daily shower. The house that records the most showers that were limited to 5 minutes or less (per person) receives a prize.


A brief description of the institution's water recovery and reuse initiatives:

Ford Hall has two cisterns to capture rainwater, with 25,000 gallons and 30,000 gallons capacity and a 5,000 gallon overflow tank. This water is for non-potable uses in the building. This reduced the overall stormwater runoff at the site by 25 percent through the combination of the cistern system and a planted rooftop that encompasses 20,000 square feet. The cisterns are not separately metered so we don't have data to report on how much water is recycled each year.


A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems with water-efficient alternatives (e.g. building retrofits):
---

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.