| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50.14 |
| Liaison | Emily Zabanah |
| Submission Date | March 30, 2020 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Seneca Polytechnic
PA-12: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.77 / 1.00 |
Paula
Echeveste Sustainability Specialist - Engagement & Outreach Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample (0-100):
77.40
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
Employee Satisfaction Survey
In 2015, Seneca conducted a full employee survey.
Starting in 2018, Seneca moved to a Pulse Survey format (up to 10 questions on a current topic + 1 engagement question which the College can benchmark annually). A Pulse Survey allows Seneca to survey employees more frequently (annually) and is quicker to respond to. The pulse survey in 2018 focused on the topic of communication and for 2019, it was innovation.
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
The response occurs in two levels, dept. and college wide
Department level - individual reports are produced for each group and Human Resources partners with appropriate managers to map out a departmental communication and response plan.
Organizationally, the survey methodology produces a limited number of key measures that act as employee engagement drivers and strategies are formulated in response to those. The engagement drivers act as KPIs.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Data source is the Human Resources department.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.