Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 79.39 |
Liaison | Yolanda Cieters |
Submission Date | March 5, 2021 |
Seattle University
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
4.03 / 5.00 |
Yolanda
Cieters Associate Director CEJS |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
6,938
Full-time equivalent of employees:
1,377
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
83
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
In February 2020, a campus-wide survey was conducted to assess current commuting patterns. The survey remained open for six weeks and closed just before our campus moved online due to the COVID pandemic. With 1,644 responses, 19% of SU students and employees responded to the commuting survey. Response rates were statistically significant for all groups.
The survey collected the following data for staff/faculty/students: % of total one-way trips per mode of transportation (single occupancy vehicle; single occupancy vehicle hybrid; single occupancy vehicle electric; carpool; carpool hybrid; carpool electric; motorcycle or scooter; bus; light rail; streetcar; commuter rail; ferry; bicycle; walk); average number of one-way trips per week per commuter; average number of weeks traveled per commuter; average miles per one-way trip per commuting mode.
The survey collected the following data for staff/faculty/students: % of total one-way trips per mode of transportation (single occupancy vehicle; single occupancy vehicle hybrid; single occupancy vehicle electric; carpool; carpool hybrid; carpool electric; motorcycle or scooter; bus; light rail; streetcar; commuter rail; ferry; bicycle; walk); average number of one-way trips per week per commuter; average number of weeks traveled per commuter; average miles per one-way trip per commuting mode.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
68
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
In February 2020, a campus-wide survey was conducted to assess current commuting patterns. The survey remained open for six weeks and closed just before our campus moved online due to the CPOVID pandemic. With 1,644 responses, 19% of SU students and employees responded to the commuting survey. Response rates were statistically significant for all groups.
The survey collected the following data for staff/faculty/students: % of total one-way trips per mode of transportation (single occupancy vehicle; single occupancy vehicle hybrid; single occupancy vehicle electric; carpool; carpool hybrid; carpool electric; motorcycle or scooter; bus; light rail; streetcar; commuter rail; ferry; bicycle; walk); average number of one-way trips per week per commuter; average number of weeks traveled per commuter; average miles per one-way trip per commuting mode.
The survey collected the following data for staff/faculty/students: % of total one-way trips per mode of transportation (single occupancy vehicle; single occupancy vehicle hybrid; single occupancy vehicle electric; carpool; carpool hybrid; carpool electric; motorcycle or scooter; bus; light rail; streetcar; commuter rail; ferry; bicycle; walk); average number of one-way trips per week per commuter; average number of weeks traveled per commuter; average miles per one-way trip per commuting mode.
Optional Fields
Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
Single-occupancy vehicle | 17 | 32 |
Zero-emissions vehicle | 0.40 | 2 |
Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 59.60 | 17 |
Vanpool or carpool | 4 | 10 |
Public transport or campus shuttle | 18 | 37 |
Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 0.60 | 0.10 |
Distance education / telecommute | 0.40 | 1 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
NOTE 1: The numbers for "Total full-time equivalent student enrollment" and "Full-time equivalent of employees" in this credit are for FY20 and therefore different from the numbers in "PRE-5 Academics and Demographics" (FY19 data).
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.