Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 69.41
Liaison Yolanda Cieters
Submission Date Feb. 22, 2016
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

Seattle University
PA-5: Assessing Diversity and Equity

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Phillip Thompson
Director
CEJS
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

None
Has the institution assessed diversity and equity in terms of campus climate?:
Yes

None
A brief description of the campus climate assessment(s) :
Achieving and engaging diversity has provided the focus for the university’s Task Force on Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. The task force, appointed in September 2013, was charged with assessing the current state of equity and inclusion on campus and recommending further steps for the university to move forward with enhancing our core value of diversity. In order to better understand the campus climate, the task force and university leaders recognized the need for a comprehensive tool that would provide campus climate metrics for students, faculty, and staff. To that end, the university appointed the Climate Study Working Group (CSWG) in 2014. The CSWG was comprised of faculty, staff, students, and administrators. Ultimately, Seattle University contracted with Rankin & Associates Consulting (R&A) to conduct a campus-wide study entitled, “Seattle University Assessment for Learning, Living, and Working.” Data gathering focused on the experiences and perceptions of various constituent groups. Based on the findings, the Task Force on Diversity and Inclusive Excellence will develop recommendations to share with the university community. In September 2015, the University published the results of the 2015 academic year's Campus Climate Report. Seattle University community members completed 2,634 surveys for an overall response rate of 29%. Only surveys that were at least 50% completed were included in the final data set for analyses. Response rates by constituent group varied: 24% (n = 1,081) for Undergraduate Students, 18% (n = 362) for Graduate Students, 36% (n = 285) for Law Students, 49% (n = 566) for Staff/Administrators, and 46% (n = 340) for Faculty. Areas of strength identified by the assessment are: high levels of comfort with the climate at Seattle University; Positive attitudes about workplace climate (by employees); Positive attitudes about faculty work (by faculty respondents); Positive attitudes about academic experiences (by students); Intent to Persist (by students respondents). But certain areas of improvement were also identified. As a response, in the January 2016 Final Report, The Task Force for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence identified six goals, each supported by several initiatives, that will propel the university’s commitment to equity, access, and community. 1. Realize an organizational infrastructure that embeds inclusive excellence in all aspects of the Seattle University experience 2. Integrate inclusive excellence across curricular and co-curricular offerings 3. Build and sustain the capacity of students, staff, and faculty to engage, teach, and lead through an inclusive excellence lens 4. Meet the challenges and opportunities of recruiting and graduating a diverse student body 5. Meet the challenges and opportunities of recruiting and retaining talented faculty and staff 6. Maximize the university’s capacity for social change in the local community

None
Has the institution assessed student diversity and educational equity?:
Yes

None
A brief description of the student diversity and educational equity assessment(s):
One of the three suggestions that emerged from the September 2015 Campus Climate survey was related to the diversity at Seattle University. These respondents indicated that they would like to see an increase in diversity and to have it be truly practiced rather than simply spoken about. In response, the January 2016 final report emphasizes heavily the University's goals to address the affordability of Seattle University and the impact of financial distress on students by developing and expanding strategies for assisting low-income students and students experiencing financial hardship. Furthermore, large efforts are to be made to adequately prepare students for engagement in a diverse society and ensure the infusion of diversity and inclusion into the curriculum and disciplines across all schools and colleges by exploring the development of enhanced inclusive excellence curricular offering(s) and the adaptation of existing courses and programs.

None
Has the institution assessed employee diversity and employment equity?:
Yes

None
A brief description of the employee diversity and employment equity assessment(s):
On the Institutional Research page, a breakdown of the demographics of the employees on campus is available. This is conducted annually. See: http://www.seattleu.edu/ir/facts/

None
Has the institution assessed diversity and equity in terms of governance and public engagement?:
Yes

None
A brief description of the governance and public engagement assessment(s):
Achieving and engaging diversity has provided the focus for the university’s Task Force on Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. The task force, appointed in September 2013, was charged with assessing the current state of equity and inclusion on campus and recommending further steps for the university to move forward with enhancing our core value of diversity. In order to better understand the campus climate, the task force and university leaders recognized the need for a comprehensive tool that would provide campus climate metrics for students, faculty, and staff. To that end, the university appointed the Climate Study Working Group (CSWG) in 2014. The CSWG was comprised of faculty, staff, students, and administrators.

None
The website URL where information about the assessment(s) is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.