| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 41.59 |
| Liaison | Adam Maurer |
| Submission Date | Dec. 18, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Seattle Central College
EN-10: Community Partnerships
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 3.00 |
Adam
Maurer District Sustainability Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
1st Partnership
Seattle 2030 District
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? :
Yes
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe?:
Multi-year or ongoing
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus?:
The partnership supports at least one, but not all three, dimensions of sustainability
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (Yes, No, or Not Sure):
Not Sure
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above:
Seattle Colleges, which Seattle Central College is a part of, is a member of the Seattle 2030 High Performance Building District. As members, the college has agreed to make progress on building environmental efficiency in the realms of energy, water, and transportation. To track progress on the target goals, the college shares information on energy and water use and transportation habits and initiatives. http://www.2030districts.org/seattle
2nd Partnership
---
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (2nd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (2nd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus? (2nd partnership):
---
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (2nd partnership) (Yes, No, or Not Sure):
---
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above (2nd partnership):
---
3rd Partnership
---
Does the institution provide financial or material support for the partnership? (3rd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership timeframe? (3rd partnership):
---
Which of the following best describes the partnership’s sustainability focus? (3rd partnership):
---
Are underrepresented groups and/or vulnerable populations engaged as equal partners in strategic planning, decision-making, implementation and review? (3rd partnership) (Yes, No, or Unknown):
---
A brief description of the institution’s formal community partnership to advance sustainability, including website URL (if available) and information to support each affirmative response above (3rd partnership):
---
Optional Fields
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.